On Tuesday 09 April 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> - #if defined(CONFIG_SMC91X) || defined(CONFIG_SMC91x_MODULE)
> -static void __init sdp2430_display_init(void)
> -{
> - int r;
> -
> - static struct gpio gpios[] __initdata = {
> - { SDP2430_LCD_PANEL_ENABLE_GPIO, G
* Stephen Rothwell [121126 02:58]:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c between commit b022e17b1c7e ("OMAP: common.c:
> remove init call to vram") from the omap_dss2 tree and commit
> f583f0f2c720 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Move omap_reser
* Tomi Valkeinen [120924 06:12]:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 12:43 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > > drivers/video/omap/lcd_ams_delta.c between commit 9586778de55
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 12:43 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/video/omap/lcd_ams_delta.c between commit 9586778de558 ("OMAPFB1:
> > remove unnecessary includes")
On Monday 24 September 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> drivers/video/omap/lcd_ams_delta.c between commit 9586778de558 ("OMAPFB1:
> remove unnecessary includes") from the tree and commit e27e35ec735f
> ("ARM: OMAP1: Move board-ams-del
5 matches
Mail list logo