On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 13:11:02 + Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 04 September 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Right. The PCI i/o reserved area has a dummy physical address of 0 and
> > needs to be skipped by ioremap searches. So we don't set
> > VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING to prevent matches by iore
On Tuesday 04 September 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> Right. The PCI i/o reserved area has a dummy physical address of 0 and
> needs to be skipped by ioremap searches. So we don't set
> VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING to prevent matches by ioremap. The vm_struct settings
> don't really matter when we do the r
Hi Rob,
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:44:16 -0500 Rob Herring wrote:
>
> Right. The PCI i/o reserved area has a dummy physical address of 0 and
> needs to be skipped by ioremap searches. So we don't set
> VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING to prevent matches by ioremap. The vm_struct settings
> don't really matter
On 09/04/2012 04:01 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 08:08:24AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 04 September 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
>>> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c between commit a849088aa155 ("AR
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 08:08:24AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 September 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mm/mmu.c between commit a849088aa155 ("ARM: Fix ioremap() of
> > address zero") from the arm-current
On Tuesday 04 September 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c between commit a849088aa155 ("ARM: Fix ioremap() of
> address zero") from the arm-current tree and commit c2794437091a ("ARM:
> Add fixed PCI i/o mapping") from
6 matches
Mail list logo
