On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:40:23PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 87143f404f33 ("arm64: mm: use XN table mapping attributes for the linear
> region")
>
> from the arm
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 06:48:35PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:28:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > e710c29e0177 ("arm64: mte: make
Hi all,
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:28:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
>
> between commit:
>
> e710c29e0177 ("arm64: mte: make the per-task SCTLR_EL1 field usable
> elsewhere")
>
> from the arm64 tr
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:06 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
>
> between commit:
>
> 49b3cf035edc ("kasan: arm64: set TCR_EL1.TBID1 when enabled")
>
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
>
> 68cd215
Hi Catalin,
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:48:35 +0100 Catalin Marinas
wrote:
>
> Thanks for fixing this up. Not ideal, indeed, but I can push a clean-up
> patch after -rc1 to move set_memory_valid() to an arm64-specific
> set_memory.h (which would include asm-generic/set_memory.h). Given that
> my for-n
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:41:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 9b0aa14e3155 ("arm64: mm: add set_memory_valid()")
>
> from the arm64 tree and patch:
6 matches
Mail list logo