Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:46:33 +0300 Daniel Baluta
wrote:
>
> > I added the following fix for today (include/sound/sof/header.h
> > probably should have something similar):
>
> Thanks for doing this! Is this patch in linux-next already? I couldn't find
> it.
Its part of the commit
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:04 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/sound/sof/dai-imx.h:11,
> from :
> include/sound/sof/header.
Looks like the merge resolution is not quite right.
I have used the sound-asoc tree from next-20190808 for today.
I am still getting this failure ...
Intel people, any thoughts?
I provided a solution on alsa-devel yesterday, see 'ASoC: SOF: fix HDA
direct MMIO access'
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:16:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:08:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dsp.c: In function 'hda_resume':
> > sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-dsp.c:360:22: error: 'hlink' undeclared (first use
> > in this function)
> >
Hi all,
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:08:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/kobject.h:19,
> from include/linux/device.h:16,
>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:27:53PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 11:35, Mark Brown wrote:
> > We can't leave this broken in -next for that long, can you please post
> > the patch now if you've already got it?
> OK, but I need some time to setup my environment to send this pat
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 11:35, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:12:47AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
> > snd-soc-sprd-platform-objs := sprd-pcm-dma.o sprd-pcm-compress.o
>
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SPRD) += snd-soc-sprd-platform.o
>
> > I will send out one incremental patch to fix this
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:12:47AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> snd-soc-sprd-platform-objs := sprd-pcm-dma.o sprd-pcm-compress.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SPRD) += snd-soc-sprd-platform.o
> I will send out one incremental patch to fix this issue after my
> business trip. Thanks.
We can't leave this
Hi,
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 08:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "sprd_platform_compr_ops" [sound/soc/sprd/sprd-pcm-dma.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> cce1396936ef (
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:11:44PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Anyway I think what you've done in next, make the code depend on
> COMMON_CLOCK, is the best option. If anyone cares about that driver on
> powerpc platforms that don't support COMMON_CLOCK they should speak up.
It's probably fin
Mark Brown writes:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:29:55PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Mark Brown writes:
>
>> > Hrm, seems PowerPC is still not using the common clock API - is there
>> > any plan for that? There are some ASoC PowerPC uses so it's going to be
>> > a bit of an issue as we expa
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:29:55PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Mark Brown writes:
> > Hrm, seems PowerPC is still not using the common clock API - is there
> > any plan for that? There are some ASoC PowerPC uses so it's going to be
> > a bit of an issue as we expand our use of the clock API
Mark Brown writes:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:33:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
>> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic32x4-clk.c: In function 'clk_aic32x4_pll_prepare':
>> include/linux/ker
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:33:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic32x4-clk.c: In function 'clk_aic32x4_pll_prepare':
> include/linux/kernel.h:979:32: error: derefer
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:39:39AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Mark, could you apply it on your tree?
> And I already took back the API change from for-next branch for
> avoiding the bisection breakage.
> > Or let me pull your tree into mine.
> ... so Mark, please send a pull request to me f
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 08:37:25 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 03:18:23 +0100,
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > sound/soc/xilinx/xlnx_formatter_pcm.c
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 03:18:23 +0100,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/xilinx/xlnx_formatter_pcm.c: In function 'xlnx_formatter_pcm_new':
> sound/soc/xilinx/xlnx_formatter_pcm
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:51:13AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit
> 81e9b0a07889 ("ASoC: topology: Give more data to clients via callbacks")
> I have used the sound-aoc tree from next-20180416 again today.
Ugh, reverted that and the following commit which depends on it.
s
x27;; Mark Brown; Liam Girdwood
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List
Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
Hi all,
I think I miss the header file (#include ) I will fix it ASAP.
Sorry about that.
Thanks!
Regards,
Shuming Fan
-Origin
Hi all,
I think I miss the header file (#include )
I will fix it ASAP. Sorry about that.
Thanks!
Regards,
Shuming Fan
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 9:03 AM
To: Mark Brown; Liam Girdwood
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing Lis
On Tuesday 27 March 2018 04:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:24:43AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
You need to mention dependencies between patches when publishing and I
don't seem to have a copy of that patch, accord
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:24:43AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
> On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > You need to mention dependencies between patches when publishing and I
> > don't seem to have a copy of that patch, according to the list archives
> > Alex asked you to mak
On Thursday 22 March 2018 07:08 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:15:16AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
There is a patch dependency .
Below patch not merged yet. We submitted for upstream review.
[PATCH V2] ASoC: dwc: I2S Controller instance param added
You need to mention de
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:15:16AM +0530, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
> There is a patch dependency .
> Below patch not merged yet. We submitted for upstream review.
> [PATCH V2] ASoC: dwc: I2S Controller instance param added
You need to mention dependencies between patches when publishing and I
don'
On Wednesday 21 March 2018 08:15 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 01:30:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Caused by commit
363fe37948e2 ("ASoC: amd: dma driver changes for BT I2S controller instance")
I have used the sound-asoc tree from next-20180320 for today.
Dropped.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 01:30:40PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit
> 363fe37948e2 ("ASoC: amd: dma driver changes for BT I2S controller
> instance")
> I have used the sound-asoc tree from next-20180320 for today.
Dropped.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 13 March 2018 06:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/codecs/da7219.o: In function `.da7219_remove':
> da7219.c:(.text+0xcbc): undefined reference to `.clkdev_drop'
>
> C
On 3/2/2018 7:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c: In function 'cht_codec_init':
sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_nau8824.c:137:29: error: passing argume
On 2/19/2018 5:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c: In function 'cz_da7219_init':
sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c:79:22: error: passing argument 1 o
Hi Stephen
Thank you for your report.
It seems added new drivers are not based on new framework.
I will post fixup patch for these.
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.c: In function 'cz_d
Hi Mark
> > Thank you for reporting.
> > It is my fault, this patch might cause other issue.
> > I'm asking to Mark to remove it from his branch.
>
> Dropped.
Thank you !
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:49:44AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen
>
> Thank you for reporting.
> It is my fault, this patch might cause other issue.
> I'm asking to Mark to remove it from his branch.
Dropped.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Stephen
Thank you for reporting.
It is my fault, this patch might cause other issue.
I'm asking to Mark to remove it from his branch.
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> /home/sfr/next/next/sound/soc/soc-core.c: In fu
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 01:54:47PM +0200, robert.jarz...@free.fr wrote:
> I will resend an incremental version of this patch alone Mark this evening if
> that
> suits you, with the bracket missing in wm9712.c:661 added.
I fixed this already.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Stephen and Mark,
This is my mess. And today my mailer is not my usual one, please don't blame me
for its probably awfull rendering.
Somehow, in my last serie, in wm9712_soc_probe(), a closing bracket has
disappeared.
This affects only wm9712.c, not the others, ie. the commit :
- 2ed1a8e "AS
Sorry for the trouble.
Looks like these rt5514_spi_* functions should be guarded by #if
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_RT5514_SPI)
I'll resend the patch to address this.
Thanks,
Hsin-yu
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's l
Hi all,
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:51:35 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:01:16 + Bard Liao wrote:
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:54 AM
> > > To: Mark Brown; Liam Gi
Hi Bard,
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:01:16 + Bard Liao wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:54 AM
> > To: Mark Brown; Liam Girdwood
> > Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Bard Liao
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:54 AM
> To: Mark Brown; Liam Girdwood
> Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Bard Liao
> Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
>
Hi Stephen
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "asoc_simple_card_clk_enable"
> [sound/soc/generic/snd-soc-simple-card.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "asoc_simple_card_clk_disable"
> [sound/soc/generic/snd-soc-simple-car
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:55:38PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:41:15AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > > 8ca9edc837932469b81b8b47ea43a074b6add970
> > > ("mfd: davinci_voicecodec: Tidyup header difinitions")
> > Reverted.
On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:41:15AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > > In file included from sound/soc/codecs/cq93vc.c:32:0:
> > > include/linux/mfd/davinci_voicecodec.h:31:27: fatal error:
> > > mach/hardware.h: No such file or directory
> > >
>
> > A
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:41:15AM +, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > In file included from sound/soc/codecs/cq93vc.c:32:0:
> > include/linux/mfd/davinci_voicecodec.h:31:27: fatal error: mach/hardware.h:
> > No such file or directory
> >
> As I indicated on cover letter, this patch is based on
Hi Stephen, Mark
> In file included from sound/soc/codecs/cq93vc.c:32:0:
> include/linux/mfd/davinci_voicecodec.h:31:27: fatal error: mach/hardware.h:
> No such file or directory
>
> Probably caused by commit
>
> 4de429888c5b ("ASoC: cq93vc: remove MFD_DAVINCI_VOICECODEC dependency for
> CQ
Yes, it's because Mark applied a chain of patches but missed the first
patch in the chain that added the wm_coeff_base_reg() function
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 11:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:18:29AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> sound-asoc is missing patch
> ASoC: sun4i-codec: Add support for optional reset control to quirks
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg56289.html
> which commit 8d9e4c9e993f ("ASoC: sun4i-codec: Add support for A31 p
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-codec.c:1188:2: error: unknown field 'has_reset'
> specified in initializer
> .has_reset
Hi
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig build) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c: In function 'asoc_simple_card_dai_link_of':
> sound/soc/generic/simple-card.c:350:8: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'asoc_simple_ca
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:07:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/intel/boards/bxt_rt298.c:257:3: error: unknown field 'be_id'
> specified in initializer
>.be_id
On May 06, 2016, 13:03, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This patch was the 3rd in of a set of 3, and the header you added below was
> > added as part of the 2nd patch of that set, hence why it is missing here. I
> > assume the first 2 patches are still being reviewed by Mark.
>
> Yes. The ID patch should
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:48:51AM +, Opensource [Adam Thomson] wrote:
> This patch was the 3rd in of a set of 3, and the header you added below was
> added as part of the 2nd patch of that set, hence why it is missing here. I
> assume the first 2 patches are still being reviewed by Mark.
Yes
On May 06, 2016, 01:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/codecs/da7219.c:1964:23: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'ACPI_PTR' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> 8<
> From: Philipp Zabel
> Subject: [PATCH] fixup! ASoC: hdmi-codec: Add ELD control
Please also use subject lines that match the style for the subsystem.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:40:11AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> 8<
> From: Philipp Zabel
> Subject: [PATCH] fixup! ASoC: hdmi-codec: Add ELD control
Please don't bury patches in the middle of e-mails.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Am Freitag, den 22.04.2016, 12:03 +1000 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/notifier.h:13:0,
> from include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:6,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:06:13PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:32:09AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:35:28AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > a86d505783e4 ("ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Adding nau88l25+ssm4567 machi
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:32:09AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:35:28AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > a86d505783e4 ("ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Adding nau88l25+ssm4567 machine
> > driver")
> Okay both went it same time, I will send a patch for
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:32:09AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:35:28AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > a86d505783e4 ("ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Adding nau88l25+ssm4567 machine
> > driver")
> Okay both went it same time, I will send a patch for this
> Somehow Feng's bo
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:35:28AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c: In function 'fsl_asoc_card_late_probe':
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c:420:38:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:48:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:04:22 +0200 Ricard Wanderlof
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 09:40:41AM +0200, Ricard
Hi Ricard,
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:48:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:04:22 +0200 Ricard Wanderlof
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 09:40:41AM +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Stephe
Hi Ricard,
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:04:22 +0200 Ricard Wanderlof
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 09:40:41AM +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > In fact the exact same construct is used by a ha
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 09:40:41AM +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > In fact the exact same construct is used by a handful of other codec
> > drivers which apparently don't fail.
>
> > I'm suspecting s
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 09:40:41AM +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> In fact the exact same construct is used by a handful of other codec
> drivers which apparently don't fail.
> I'm suspecting something slightly more convoluted like a missing #inclu
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from sound/soc/codecs/ics43432.c:12:0:
> sound/soc/codecs/ics43432.c:60:25: error: 'ics43432_dt_ids' undeclared here
> (not i
Hi all,
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:25:01 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/sti/sti_uniperif.c: In function 'sti_uniperiph_dai_suspend':
> sound/soc/sti/sti_uniperif.c:81:2: error: im
Dear All,
I will send a patch to fix it immediately.
Thanks.
Bard Liao
Computer Peripherals Business Unit
Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
886-3-578-0211 ext. 3334
bardl...@realtek.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au]
> Sent: Thursday, April 30,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au]
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:12 AM
> To: Mark Brown; Liam Girdwood
> Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Bard Liao
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after
Hi all,
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:01:20 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/codecs/rt5670.c: In function 'is_sys_clk_from_pll':
> sound/soc/codecs/rt5670.c:519:38: error: 'struct snd_s
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:50:40AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:09:35AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > Very sorry guys my fault, not sure how that slipped through. Mark
> > do you want an incremental fix or shall I respin the two patches
> > in question?
> Ah... ok
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:00:47PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/codecs/arizona.c: In function 'arizona_out_ev':
> sound/soc/codecs/arizona.c:738:57: error: 'struc
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:09:35AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:00:47PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > sound/soc/codecs/arizona.c:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:51:15PM +0800, Sean Cross wrote:
> That gives it almost the exact same kernel config as the SGTL5000.
> Is this the sort of thing you can apply on your end, or would you like
> me to resubmit a v12 with just this file? I'm afraid I don't have a PPC
> toolchain to test
On 08/18/14 06:30, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> sound/soc/fsl/imx-pcm-fiq.c:31:21: fatal error: asm/fiq.h: No such file or
> directory
> #include
> ^
>
> Ca
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:17:01 + Mark Brown wrote:
>
> Sorry, it's fixed already - your fetch must've raced with my fix last
> night.
No worries, that can happen since I fetch all the trees before I start
merging.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:10:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
Sorry, it's fixed already - your fetch must've raced with my fix last
night.
signature.asc
Description: Digital s
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:54:07AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
Fixed, thanks.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:18:28PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit df7e4082f47d ("ASoC: tegra: Enable COMPILE_TEST
> builds"). If you are going to do that, please test via (at least) an
> x86_64 allmodconf build. Including asm/mach-types.h is an architecture
> dependency.
I'm
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:04:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64allmodconfig) failed like this:
Applied, thanks.
> As an aside, should ak4642_of_match be marked "const"?
Probably.
--
To unsubscribe from this li
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:46:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Then you need to have a different branch being tested by Fenguang and
> friends to what you have in linux-next. The stuff that you put into
> linux-next has to be at least build tested, so you should delay pushing
> it up to you
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:15:34 + Mark Brown
wrote:
>
> Honestly when I'm travelling with the automated build testing Fenguang
> and friends are doing it's actually faster to just push things up rather
> than doing testing of branches like this locally, their build farm
> usually kicks
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:48:48AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit 2882fcb3cfe6 ("ASoC: adsp: Add ADSP base support").
> Please build test this stuff - there is a typo in the Makefile. :-(
Actually already fixed, just forgot to push up.
Honestly when I'm travelling with the
82 matches
Mail list logo
