Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > drivers/mfd/stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_irq_init': > drivers/mfd/stmpe.c:1000:15: error: 'struct stmpe' has no member named > 'irq_base' >base = stmpe->irq_base; >^ > > Caused by commit 3ba1d516d5fe ("mfd: stmpe: ro

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

Hi Lee, On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:06:55 +0800 Lee Jones wrote: > > > > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > > > drivers/mfd/tps65218: struct i2c_device_id is 32 bytes. The last of 1 is: > > > 0x74 0x70 0x73 0x36 0x35 0x32 0x31

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

> > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/mfd/tps65218: struct i2c_device_id is 32 bytes. The last of 1 is: > > 0x74 0x70 0x73 0x36 0x35 0x32 0x31 0x38 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 > > 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

Stephen, > > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/mfd/tps65218: struct i2c_device_id is 32 bytes. The last of 1 is: > > 0x74 0x70 0x73 0x36 0x35 0x32 0x31 0x38 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 > > 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

Hi Lee, On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:25:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/mfd/tps65218: struct i2c_device_id is 32 bytes. The last of 1 is: > 0x74 0x70 0x73 0x36 0x35 0x32 0x31 0x38 0x00

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

Hi Lee, On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:23:31 +0800 Lee Jones wrote: > > Sorry about all this. Your mails are being filtered into an unused > mailbox for a currently unknown reason. I will investigate this > immediately. It was a mistake to push this patch, I will rectify right > away. I was beginning to

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

Hi Stephen, > > > > > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > > > > > > > In file included from drivers/mfd/max665x.c:19:0: > > > > > include/linux/mfd/max665x-private.h:31:1: error: expected ';', > > > > > identifier or '

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

Hi Lee, On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:32:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:05:08 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:14:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:42:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

Hi Lee, On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:05:08 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:14:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:42:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > allmodc

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

Hi Lee, On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:14:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:42:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > In file included from drivers/mfd/max665x.c:1

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree

Hi Lee, On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:42:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the mfd-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from drivers/mfd/max665x.c:19:0: > include/linux/mfd/max665x-private.h:31:1: error: expected ';', identif