Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 4:30 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c: In function 'xgpio_remove': > drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:275:2: error: implicit declaration of function > 'pm_runtime_disable' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 275 | pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:38 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this: Oops! > I have applied the following patch for today: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 21:29:30 +1000 > Subject: [PA

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

2017-11-13 20:33 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell : > Hi all, > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:20:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: >> >> drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from i

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi all, On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:20:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible > pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Linus Walleij > wrote: >> >> I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing >> to do at this point. > > Umm, you can't really validly apply my merge fix patch to the gp

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Linus, On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Linus Walleij wrote: > > I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing > to do at this point. Umm, you can't really validly apply my merge fix patch to the gpio tree without merging in part of the tip tree (it will generate, at

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible > pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Stephen, 2017-11-02 14:20 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell : > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-uniphier.c:324:14: error: initialization from incompatible > pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-point

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > It looks like those '(' ')' chars are not what they seem ... No the owls are not what they seem. I went in and fixed the unicode weirdness, thanks! Pretty hard to see this one since I can't see it. Yours, Linus Walleij

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:09:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_irq_set_type': > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:291:2: error: stray '\357' i

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > orion5x_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1062: undefined reference to > `__devm_regmap_init_mmio_clk' > drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c:1078: undefined refe

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:11 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios': > drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c:578:12: error: implicit declarat

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Lee, On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:48:54 + Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Linus, > > I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree. Except his tree does not have the rename and extra arguments for devm_get_gpiod_from_child(), so it can't

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:48:54 + Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Linus, > > I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree. > > (see below) > > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > multi_v7_defconfig) failed lik

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, 08 Feb 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, I believe this patch would need to go in via Greg's tree. (see below) > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c: In function 'asc_set_termios': >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c: In function '_gpiochip_irqchip_add': > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:1622:62: error: macro "WARN_ON" passed 3 arguments

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this: > > arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c: In function 'ppc4xx_gpio_set': > arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_gpio.c:93:26: error: unused variable '

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c: In function 'tps65218_gpio_request': > drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65218.c:74:26: error: 'struct gpio

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, >> I have used the gpio tree from next-20160128 for today. > > I am still getting this error. Sorry for slow attendance :( Fixed it now, I hope. Yours, Linus Walleij

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Linus, On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:45:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c: In function 'mpc8xxx_gpio_save_regs': > drivers/gpio/gpio-mpc8xxx.c:57:21: error: implicit de

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Linus, On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:58:34 +0100 Linus Walleij wrote: > > Pushed now, I was waiting for the autobuilders to munch it first. > Sorry for the delay :( No worries, I have refetched it. BTW, its good that the autobuilders have had a go at it :-) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:08:58 +0100 Linus Walleij > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik >> wrote: >> > Stephen Rothwell writes: >> > >> >> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without >>

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Linus, On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:08:58 +0100 Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik > wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell writes: > > > >> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without > >> CONFIG_OF) failed like this: > >> > >> drivers/gpio/g

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Stephen Rothwell writes: > >> Hi Linus, >> >> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without >> CONFIG_OF) failed like this: >> >> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function 'pxa_gpio_probe': >> drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c:648:12

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (lots without > CONFIG_OF) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: In function 'pxa_gpio_probe': > drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c:648:12: error: 'pxa_irq_domain_ops' undeclared (first > use in this fun

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:37:55 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: >> >> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In functio

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Linus, On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:37:55 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c: In function 'nsp_gpio_probe': > drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:699:4: e

RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Stephen, Sorry. It's my mistake. In the first patch set, I tested it with "irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOREQUEST);" and in the v2 patch set the old one got in. Regards Dhananjay -Original Message- From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au] Sent: Wednesday, Decembe

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c: In function 'etraxfs_gpio_irq_request_resources': > drivers/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.c:300:2: error: 'ret' undeclare

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Em Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:23:26 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König escreveu: > Hello Linus, > > I forgot to add you (and also Stephen) to Cc for my slightly different > patch. You can find it at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/30908/. > > I just sent you and Stephen a bounce if you want to comment. My pl

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hello Linus, I forgot to add you (and also Stephen) to Cc for my slightly different patch. You can find it at https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/30908/. I just sent you and Stephen a bounce if you want to comment. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-Kön

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c: In function 'tc358743_probe_of': > drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c:1786:22: error: too few argume

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Chanwoo, On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:19:12 +0900 Chanwoo Choi wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > On 08/13/2015 08:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Uwe, > > > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:16:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Stephen, On 08/13/2015 08:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Uwe, > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:16:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >>> allyesconfig) fai

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Uwe, On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:16:42 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error: t

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hello, On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error: too few arguments to function > 'devm_gpiod_get_optional' > palmas_usb->

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Uwe, On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:27:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:21:07 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > > allyesconfig)

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Uwe, On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:21:07 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error: t

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hello Stephen, On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:10:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c:211:25: error: too few arguments to function > 'devm_gpiod_get_optional' > palm

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Dmitry, On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 22:46:52 -0700 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Thank you for the patch. I think we actually want GPIOD_OUT_LOW and kill > the "else" branch altogether, like below. I will use your patch from today. Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Stephen, On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:07:41PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c: In function 'elants_i2c_probe': > drivers/input/touchscreen/el

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 04:55:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dln2.c: In function 'dln2_gpio_probe': > drivers/gpio/gpio-dln2.c:469:12: error: 'struct gpio_chi

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dln2.c: In function 'dln2_gpio_probe': > drivers/gpio/gpio-dln2.c:469:12: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

Hi Alexandre, On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:10:14 +0900 Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > I have sent a patch to fix this. In the meantime, if the merge > conflict of the GPIO tree on board-paz00.c is solved by taking the > GPIO version, there is no build error. > > There are a few important patches pending

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

I have sent a patch to fix this. In the meantime, if the merge conflict of the GPIO tree on board-paz00.c is solved by taking the GPIO version, there is no build error. There are a few important patches pending in the GPIO tree that should undergo testing - Stephen, do you think you could resolve

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:31:53AM +0200, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.c:20:0: > include/linu

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Linus, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) > failed like this: > > drivers/mfd/stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_irq_init': > drivers/mfd/stmpe.c:1000:15: error: 'struct stmpe' has no member named

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c: In function 'pcf857x_irq_domain_map': > drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c:206:2: error: implicit declaration of fun

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:45:13 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Grant, > > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_gpio_irq_init': > drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c:313:23: error: 'struct gpio_ch

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the gpio tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c: In function 'stmpe_gpio_irq_init': > drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c:313:23: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no member