On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 14:10:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/built-in.o: In function `setup_arch':
> (.init.text+0xc38): undefined reference to `early_console'
> arch/sparc/
On Mon 04-03-13 14:28:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `console_unlock':
> cpu_pm.c:(.text+0x4418): undefined reference to `__bad_udelay'
>
> Caused by commit 4d
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:30:40 +0800 Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:54:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c: In function 'show_mem':
> > ar
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:54:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c: In function 'show_mem':
> arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c:60:23: error: invalid operands to binary <<
Hi Stephen,
On 01/21/2013 02:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
failed like this:
mm/memblock.c: In function 'memblock_find_in_range_node':
mm/memblock.c:104:2: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct
movablecore_
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:09:19 -0800
> I suspect that most people expect "color". And given that this
> patchset removes COLOUR_ALIGN_DOWN (and should have removed
> arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_32.c:COLOR_ALIGN), we end up with
That's fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:30:59 -0500 (EST)
David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:18:47 -0800
>
> > s/colour/color/
>
> The whole file uses the COLOUR spelling in it's macros, for
> consistency I see no reason not to use the same spelling
> for local variables.
>
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:18:47 -0800
> s/colour/color/
The whole file uses the COLOUR spelling in it's macros, for
consistency I see no reason not to use the same spelling
for local variables.
Else, fix the whole file instead of leaving an inconsistent
mess around.
--
To u
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:09:57 +1100
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c: In function 'arch_get_unmapped_area':
> arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c:92:16: error: unu
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 20:01:54 -0800 Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> oop, I fixed that but forgot to commit the changes, sorry.
>
> s/mm/current->mm/
I have applied this to the akpm tree today:
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:51:18 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] mm: fix for u
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:58:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c: In function 'hugetlb_get_unmapped_area_topdown':
> arch/x86/mm/hugetlbpage.c:299:20: error: 'mm' un
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:34:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:24:08 -0500 David Fries wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:11:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (spar
Hi David,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:24:08 -0500 David Fries wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:11:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `rtc
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:11:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `rtc_hctosys':
> hctosys.c:(.init.text+0x4a98): undefined reference to `rtc_hctosys_re
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:01:36 +0800 Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> Index: linux/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h
> ===
> --- linux.orig/arch/microblaze/include/asm/atomic.h 2012-09-13
> 17:56:54.206807900 +0800
> +++ linux/arch/micr
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:01:21PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> mm/internal.h: In function 'swap_cache_hit':
> mm/internal.h:377:3: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'atomic
16 matches
Mail list logo
