Op 2021-02-10 om 04:11 schreef Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_sched.c:263:1: error: return type is an incomplete
> type
> 263 | v3d_gpu_reset_for_timeout(struct v3d_de
Hi
Am 14.01.21 um 01:31 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c: In function 'drm_need_swiotlb':
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c:202:6: error: implicit declaration of function
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:10:15PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 05:19:06 -0500 "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (ar
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 05:19:06 -0500 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from drivers/
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:27:11AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:23 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:43 AM Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > > multi_v
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
> > +#include
> > +#endif
No conditional includes please. And the proper
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:43 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nou
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:26:
> include/linux/swiotlb.h: In function 'swiotl
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 2:43 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:26:
> include/linux/swiotlb.h: In function 'swiotlb_max_mapp
Am 30.10.20 um 01:07 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c: In function 'nouveau_ttm_init':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c:320:19: error: implicit declarati
Hi Stephen,
Le lun. 12 oct. 2020 à 15:24, Stephen Rothwell
a écrit :
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) fai
Hi Stephen,
Le lun. 12 oct. 2020 à 15:24, Stephen Rothwell
a écrit :
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) fai
Hi all,
[Just adding Dave to cc's]
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:24:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, tod
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:42:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/clk.h:13,
>
Hi all,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:09:03 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/clk.h:13,
from drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c:10:
drivers/gpu
Hi all,
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 10:55:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_display.c: In function
> 'qxl_display_read_client_monitors_config':
> include/drm/drm_modeset_l
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:47:49 +1000 Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> My bad, my local builds passed, as I had made the change but forgot
> the commit --amend
>
> Pushed out a new head with it in it now.
Excellent, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpwhIJQqFVu5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digi
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:36, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:59:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.
Hi all,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:59:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c: In function
> 'amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu':
> drivers/gpu
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 08:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:33:24 +0200 Thomas Zimmermann
> wrote:
> >
> > We recently dropped the _unlock() suffix from drm_gem_object_put(). This
> > patch should be ok.
>
> Yes, but what it shows is that the drm-
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 08:33:24 +0200 Thomas Zimmermann
wrote:
>
> We recently dropped the _unlock() suffix from drm_gem_object_put(). This
> patch should be ok.
Yes, but what it shows is that the drm-misc tree is still based on
v5.7-rc1 and v5.8-rc1 has about 16000 more commits for you
Hi
Am 17.06.20 um 02:59 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c: In function
> 'amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_free_memory_of_gpu':
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd
On 4/29/20 10:09 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 4/29/20 12:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> allyesconfig) fa
Hi Stephen,
On 4/29/20 12:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c: In function 'c
Hi all,
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:01:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c: In function 'controlfb_mmap':
> drivers/video/fbdev/controlfb.c:756:23: error: implici
Applied. Thanks!
Alex
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 8:22 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_tmz.c:23:10: fatal error: drm/drmP.h: No
> such file or direct
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> Thanks, patch is:
> Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu
This looks like a fairly naive conversion from the old IDR API to the
XArray API. You should be able to remove mgr->lock entirely, relying on
the xa_lock for synchronising free and get. If you
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:55:03PM +0800, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > Thanks, patch is:
> > Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu
>
> Good time to get started with committing patches? In general it's kinda
> confusing if the maintainer r-bs a patch, but doesn't say
Hi Daniel/Stephen
Thanks for the report and the hints how to move forward to fix it.
> Sam, can you pls take a look at what komeda needs? you need to
> manually merge together drm-misc-next and drm-next first I think.
Merged the two tree and fixed build.
Undid the merge and checked that the buil
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:38 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_drv.c:13:
> drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.h
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:37:22 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
>
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/tree/fixups/drm-misc-next.patch?h=rerere-cache
>
> is the fixup you want. Should get baked into drm-next any moment, since
> the first drm-misc-next pull is already out.
I added that re
On 1/8/19 3:37 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:12:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: In fun
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:12:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: In function
> 'amdgpu_dm_mode_config_init':
> drive
Hi Stephen,
yeah, that is a known problem. I missed the change during rebase of the
revert.
Please see patch "2312f9842854 drm/v3d: fix broken build" which is
already in drm-misc-next and fixes the issue.
Christian.
Am 06.12.18 um 03:32 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging th
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:24:41AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:24:49 +0200 Daniel Vetter
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in
> >> dr
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:24:49 +0200 Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
>>
>> How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in
>> drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But
>> that'll pr
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:24:49 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in
> drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But
> that'll probably lead to more conflicts because git will get confused.
I'll jus
Hi,
On 21-07-17 09:24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Hi Greg&Hans,
How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in
drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But
that'll probably lead to more conflicts because git will get confused.
Or you could just delet
Hi Greg&Hans,
How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in
drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But
that'll probably lead to more conflicts because git will get confused.
Or you could just delete the set_busid hook in -staging, which renders
Hi Dave,
The following is now applicable to the drm and staging.current trees ...
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:46:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c:235:2: e
Hi all,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:10:14 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:87:2: error: unknown field 'kmap_atomic' specified in
> initializer
> .kmap_atomic = tee_shm_op
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:25:18 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>
>>> Since this is an all-new driver it might be best to stagger the pull
>>> requests and merge the n
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:25:18 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> Since this is an all-new driver it might be best to stagger the pull
>> requests and merge the new tee subsystem (or whatever it is) after drm?
>>
>> Not sure wha
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:25:18 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Since this is an all-new driver it might be best to stagger the pull
> requests and merge the new tee subsystem (or whatever it is) after drm?
>
> Not sure what to best do here ...
This will merge via Dave, so Dave just needs
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:25:12AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:10:14 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:87:2: error: u
Hi all,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:10:14 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:87:2: error: unknown field 'kmap_atomic' specified in
> initializer
> .kmap_atomic = tee_shm_op
Thanks Stephen. Looks good to me.
Logan
On 20/04/17 08:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tee/tee_shm.c:87:2: error: unknown field 'kmap_atomic' specified in
> initializer
Thanks for this. This and "drm/vmwgfx: merge fixup for set_config API change":
Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:31:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> dri
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 02:17:41PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:24:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> >
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:24:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from drivers
[cc += Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-acpi]
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:24:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:24:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c:25:0:
> include/linux/apple-gmux.h: In function 'a
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:47:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "drm_agp_release" [drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "drm_agp_acquire" [drivers/gpu/dr
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:48:34AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 08-09-15 om 01:42 schreef Stephen Rothwell:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:49:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed
Op 08-09-15 om 01:42 schreef Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:49:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_plane.c: In function
>> 'mdp
Hi all,
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:49:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5_plane.c: In function
> 'mdp5_plane_cleanup_fb':
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/mdp/mdp5/mdp5
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:30:56AM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 07/14/2015 08:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> >drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c: In fun
Hi,
On 07/14/2015 08:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c: In function
'virtio_pci_kick_out_firmware_fb':
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drm_bus.c:55:2
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:41:40AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c: In function 'tegra_atomic_complete':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c:58:2: error: i
60 matches
Mail list logo
