Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree

2017-06-14 Thread Mason
On 22/04/2017 01:43, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:12:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Mason, >> >> On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:58:58 +0200 Mason wrote: >>> >>> Anyway, the fix is trivial. >>> >>> The "pchans_used" field is an unsigned long array. >>> for_each_cl

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree

2017-04-23 Thread Vinod Koul
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:41:37AM +0200, Mason wrote: > On 22/04/2017 01:43, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > Or I drop the offending patch (done) and we get the DMA subsystem fixed > > first. Given how long it's been this way, I doubt there's any hurry to > > get this change in for the nex

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree

2017-04-22 Thread Mason
On 22/04/2017 01:43, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Or I drop the offending patch (done) and we get the DMA subsystem fixed > first. Given how long it's been this way, I doubt there's any hurry to > get this change in for the next merge window. Your solution makes sense. Vinod, could you app

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree

2017-04-21 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:12:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Mason, > > On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:58:58 +0200 Mason wrote: > > > > Anyway, the fix is trivial. > > > > The "pchans_used" field is an unsigned long array. > > for_each_clear_bit_from() expects an unsigned long pointer, > > not

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree

2017-04-21 Thread Mason
On 21/04/2017 09:58, Mason wrote: > Weird that I didn't catch this when I ran make allyesconfig. Doh! make allyesconfig builds for BE systems. CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN=y CONFIG_CPU_ENDIAN_BE8=y But the patch I originally tested with only updated the LE bitops. With the complete patch, I didn't se

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree

2017-04-21 Thread Mason
On 21/04/2017 10:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Mason wrote: > >> Anyway, the fix is trivial. >> >> The "pchans_used" field is an unsigned long array. >> for_each_clear_bit_from() expects an unsigned long pointer, >> not an array address. >> >> I'll send a patch to the drivers/dma maintainers. > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree

2017-04-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mason, On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:58:58 +0200 Mason wrote: > > Anyway, the fix is trivial. > > The "pchans_used" field is an unsigned long array. > for_each_clear_bit_from() expects an unsigned long pointer, > not an array address. > > I'll send a patch to the drivers/dma maintainers. The fix r

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree

2017-04-21 Thread Mason
On 21/04/2017 00:40, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:36:0, > from include/linux/bitmap.h:7, > from drivers/dma/sun4i-dma.c