On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 10:04 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> If there is a general consensus that this is the preferred way to go,
> I
> will post the patch as an RFC to linux-api
>
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113160637.jhekbdyfpccme3be@dhcp22.s
> use.cz
I prefer the new flag. It is cleaner a
On Tue 14-11-17 20:18:04, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Michal Hocko writes:
>
> > [Sorry for spamming, this one is the last attempt hopefully]
> >
> > On Mon 13-11-17 16:49:39, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >> On Mon 13-11-17 16:16:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >> > On Mon 13-11-17 13:00:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
Michal Hocko writes:
> [Sorry for spamming, this one is the last attempt hopefully]
>
> On Mon 13-11-17 16:49:39, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Mon 13-11-17 16:16:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > On Mon 13-11-17 13:00:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > > Yes, I have mentioned that in the previous em
On Tue 14-11-17 19:54:59, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Michal Hocko writes:
[...]
> > So this was the most simple solution I could come up
> > with. If there was a general interest for MAP_FIXED_SAFE then we can
> > introduce it later of course. I would just like the hardening merged
> > sooner rathe
Michal Hocko writes:
> On Mon 13-11-17 13:00:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>> Yes, I have mentioned that in the previous email but the amount of code
>> would be even larger. Basically every arch which reimplements
>> arch_get_unmapped_area would have to special case new MAP_FIXED flag to
>> do
Michal Hocko writes:
> On Mon 13-11-17 22:34:50, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> Michal Hocko writes:
>> > On Mon 13-11-17 10:20:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> >> [Cc arm and ppc maintainers]
>> >
>> > Hmm, it turned out to be a problem on other architectures as well.
>> > CCing more ma
On Mon 13-11-17 09:35:22, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 09:06 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > OK, so this one should take care of the backward compatibility while
> > still not touching the arch code
> > ---
> > commit 39ff9bf8597e79a032da0954aea1f0d77d137765
> > Author: Michal Hocko
> > Date:
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 16:03:14 -0800 Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> Does this kernel have "fs/binfmt_elf.c: drop MAP_FIXED usage from
> elf_map" applied? That patch was dropped due to runtime issues.
next-20171107 has that patch in it, next-20171108 does not.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 11:38:02 +1030 Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > On Wed 08-11-17 15:20:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > There are a lot of messages on the way up that look like this:
> >> >
> >> > [2.527460] Uhuuh, el
On 11/13/2017 09:06 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
OK, so this one should take care of the backward compatibility while
still not touching the arch code
---
commit 39ff9bf8597e79a032da0954aea1f0d77d137765
Author: Michal Hocko
Date: Mon Nov 13 17:06:24 2017 +0100
mm: introduce MAP_FIXED_SAFE
[Sorry for spamming, this one is the last attempt hopefully]
On Mon 13-11-17 16:49:39, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 16:16:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 13-11-17 13:00:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Yes, I have mentioned that in the previous email but the amount of code
> > >
On Mon 13-11-17 15:48:13, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:16:41PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 13-11-17 13:00:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Yes, I have mentioned that in the previous email but the amount of code
> > > would be even larger. Basically e
On Mon 13-11-17 16:16:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 13:00:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > Yes, I have mentioned that in the previous email but the amount of code
> > would be even larger. Basically every arch which reimplements
> > arch_get_unmapped_area would have to special case n
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 04:16:41PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 13:00:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > Yes, I have mentioned that in the previous email but the amount of code
> > would be even larger. Basically every arch which reimplements
> > arch_get_unmapped_area would have t
On Mon 13-11-17 15:09:09, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:11:40PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 13-11-17 10:20:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > [Cc arm and ppc maintainers]
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for testing!
> > >
> > > On Sun 12-11-17 11:38:02, Joel Stanley w
On Mon 13-11-17 13:00:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> Yes, I have mentioned that in the previous email but the amount of code
> would be even larger. Basically every arch which reimplements
> arch_get_unmapped_area would have to special case new MAP_FIXED flag to
> do vma lookup.
It turned out tha
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:11:40PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-11-17 10:20:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [Cc arm and ppc maintainers]
> >
> > Thanks a lot for testing!
> >
> > On Sun 12-11-17 11:38:02, Joel Stanley wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >
On Mon 13-11-17 10:20:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [Cc arm and ppc maintainers]
>
> Thanks a lot for testing!
>
> On Sun 12-11-17 11:38:02, Joel Stanley wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Hi Joel,
> > >
> > > On Wed 08-11-17 15:20:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > [.
On Mon 13-11-17 22:34:50, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> Michal Hocko writes:
> > On Mon 13-11-17 10:20:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >> [Cc arm and ppc maintainers]
> >
> > Hmm, it turned out to be a problem on other architectures as well.
> > CCing more maintainers. For your reference, we
Hi Michal,
Michal Hocko writes:
> On Mon 13-11-17 10:20:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> [Cc arm and ppc maintainers]
>
> Hmm, it turned out to be a problem on other architectures as well.
> CCing more maintainers. For your reference, we are talking about
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171023082608.6167-
On Mon 13-11-17 10:20:06, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [Cc arm and ppc maintainers]
Hmm, it turned out to be a problem on other architectures as well.
CCing more maintainers. For your reference, we are talking about
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171023082608.6167-1-mho...@kernel.org
which has broken archite
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:20:06AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [Cc arm and ppc maintainers]
>
> Thanks a lot for testing!
>
> On Sun 12-11-17 11:38:02, Joel Stanley wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Hi Joel,
> > >
> > > On Wed 08-11-17 15:20:50, Michal Hocko
[Cc arm and ppc maintainers]
Thanks a lot for testing!
On Sun 12-11-17 11:38:02, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > On Wed 08-11-17 15:20:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > There are a lot of messages on the way up that look lik
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On Wed 08-11-17 15:20:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>> > There are a lot of messages on the way up that look like this:
>> >
>> > [2.527460] Uhuuh, elf segement at 000d9000 requested but the
>> > memory is mapped already
>>
Hi Joel,
On Wed 08-11-17 15:20:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > There are a lot of messages on the way up that look like this:
> >
> > [2.527460] Uhuuh, elf segement at 000d9000 requested but the
> > memory is mapped already
> > [2.540160] Uhuuh, elf segement at 000d9000 requested but th
Hi,
On Wed 08-11-17 08:52:24, Joel Stanley wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20171106:
> >
> > The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch.
> >
> > The crypto tree lost its build fa
Hello Michal,
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20171106:
>
> The powerpc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch.
>
> The crypto tree lost its build failure.
>
> The akpm tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
27 matches
Mail list logo
