Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)

2020-05-29 Thread Kees Cook
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:54:56PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:06:32PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan > > index 929211039bac..27bcc2568c95 100644 > > --- a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan > > @@ -63,7 +63,7

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)

2020-05-29 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:06:32PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:44:04AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:04:36AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 5/14/20 4:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Changes since 20200512: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)

2020-05-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/28/20 11:06 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:44:04AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:04:36AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 5/14/20 4:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20200512: >>> >>> on x86_64: >>> >>> dri

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)

2020-05-28 Thread Kees Cook
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:44:04AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:04:36AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 5/14/20 4:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20200512: > > > > > > > on x86_64: > > > > drivers/ide/ide-tape.o: warning: obj

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)

2020-05-28 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:04:36AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 5/14/20 4:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20200512: > > > > on x86_64: > > drivers/ide/ide-tape.o: warning: objtool: > ide_tape_discard_merge_buffer.constprop.7()+0x4e: unreachable instruction >

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)

2020-05-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/14/20 4:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200512: > on x86_64: drivers/ide/ide-tape.o: warning: objtool: ide_tape_discard_merge_buffer.constprop.7()+0x4e: unreachable instruction drivers/scsi/sd.o: warning: objtool: sd_pr_clear()+0x1e: unreachable instruction dr

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 1/2)

2020-05-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/14/20 4:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200512: > on x86_64: drivers/input/mouse/cyapa_gen3.o: warning: objtool: cyapa_gen3_do_fw_update()+0x33: unreachable instruction drivers/input/mouse/cyapa_gen6.o: warning: objtool: cyapa_gen6_show_baseline()+0x6f: unrea

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14

2018-05-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andy, On Mon, 14 May 2018 20:14:57 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > On Mon, 14 May 2018 10:26:07 +0300 Andy Shevchenko > > wrote: > > > BTW, the drivers-x86 tree I have is > > > > https://github.com/dvhart/linux-pdx86.git#f

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14

2018-05-14 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2018 10:26:07 +0300 Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > BTW, the drivers-x86 tree I have is > > https://github.com/dvhart/linux-pdx86.git#for-next > > and the contact is Darren Hart. Is that expected? That URL was temporary work

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14

2018-05-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andy, On Mon, 14 May 2018 10:26:07 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Hmm... It seems my message was buried in the pile of the thread WRT > fixes branches. No, I just didn't read enough email early enough this morning. > Please, add our PDx86 fixes branch as well: > git://git.infradead.org/li

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14

2018-05-14 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20180511: > > New trees: btrfs-fixes > vfs-fixes > dma-mapping-fixes > > The f2fs tree gained a conflict against the vfs-fixes tree. > > The bpf-next tree gained a conflict against the bpf tree.

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (tty/serial/men_z135_uart.c)

2014-05-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/14/2014 11:15 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:31:10AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 05/14/2014 01:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20140513: >>> >> >> on x86_64: >> >> CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE=m >> but SERIAL_MEN_Z135=y. >> >> drivers/bu

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (tty/serial/men_z135_uart.c)

2014-05-14 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:31:10AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/14/2014 01:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20140513: > > > > on x86_64: > > CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE=m > but SERIAL_MEN_Z135=y. > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `men_z135_remove': > men_z135_uart.c:(

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (tty/serial/men_z135_uart.c)

2014-05-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/14/2014 01:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20140513: > on x86_64: CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE=m but SERIAL_MEN_Z135=y. drivers/built-in.o: In function `men_z135_remove': men_z135_uart.c:(.text+0x5bc53): undefined reference to `uart_remove_one_port' drivers/built-in.o: I

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (vhost_scsi)

2013-05-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
[Adding Michael to cc] On Tue, 14 May 2013 12:16:20 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > on x86_64: > > ERROR: "memcpy_fromiovec" [drivers/vhost/vhost_scsi.ko] undefined! > > > It needs to depend on NET since net/core/ provides that function. > > -- > ~Randy -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (vhost_scsi)

2013-05-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/13/13 21:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130513: > > on x86_64: ERROR: "memcpy_fromiovec" [drivers/vhost/vhost_scsi.ko] undefined! It needs to depend on NET since net/core/ provides that function. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "