Re: Splitting stk1160-ac97 as a module (Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160))

2013-05-06 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 09:59:50PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Ezequiel, All, > > On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 02:21:44PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > I'm trying to split the ac97 support into a separate module. > > So far I've managed to do this with two different approaches, > > but both of th

Re: Splitting stk1160-ac97 as a module (Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160))

2013-05-04 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Ezequiel, All, On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 02:21:44PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > I'm trying to split the ac97 support into a separate module. > So far I've managed to do this with two different approaches, > but both of them are broken in some way :-( > > Couple questions: > > 1. Is it possible

Splitting stk1160-ac97 as a module (Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160))

2013-05-04 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Hi Mauro, On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 11:52:33AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > is unreliable (doesn't do what some people expect) when SND=m and > > SND_AC97_CODEC=m, > > since VIDEO_STK1160_AC97 is a bool. > > Using select is always tricky. > > I can see a few possible fixes for it:

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)

2013-05-02 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/02/13 07:52, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > [media] stk1160: Make stk1160 module if SND is m and audio support is selected > > As reported by Randy: > > When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and > CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y > CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y > > drivers/built-in.o: In funct

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)

2013-05-02 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em 01-05-2013 14:59, Randy Dunlap escreveu: On 05/01/13 01:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. Changes since 20130430: When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and CONFIG_

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1

2013-05-02 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 05/02/2013 09:37 AM, ZX wrote: > > > On Wed, 1 May 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included >> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. >> >> Changes since 20130430: >> >> The nfsd tree lost its build failure. >>

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)

2013-05-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/01/13 13:53, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Randy, All, > > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 01:23:25PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 05/01/13 12:58, David Rientjes wrote: >>> On Wed, 1 May 2013, Yann E. MORIN wrote: >>> > When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and > CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)

2013-05-01 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Randy, All, On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 01:23:25PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/01/13 12:58, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Wed, 1 May 2013, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > > >>> When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and > >>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y > >>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y > >>> > >>>

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)

2013-05-01 Thread David Rientjes
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>> When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and > >>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y > >>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y > >>> > >>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register': > >>> (.text+0x122706): undefined reference to `snd_card_create' > >>>

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)

2013-05-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/01/13 12:58, David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 1 May 2013, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > >>> When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and >>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y >>> CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y >>> >>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register': >>> (.text+0x122706): undefined re

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)

2013-05-01 Thread David Rientjes
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and > > CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y > > CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register': > > (.text+0x122706): undefined reference to `snd_card_create' > > drivers/bui

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)

2013-05-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/01/13 12:28, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 05/01/13 01:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included >>> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. >>> >>> Cha

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)

2013-05-01 Thread Yann E. MORIN
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/01/13 01:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included > > branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. > > > > Changes since 20130430: > > > > > When CO

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160)

2013-05-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/01/13 01:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included > branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. > > Changes since 20130430: > When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y CONFIG_VIDEO_STK11