Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected)

2016-03-20 Thread Qais Yousef
On 16/03/2016 13:22, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:17:13PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +, Qais Yousef wrote: Hi Guenter, [ ... ] Qemu test results: total: 96 pass: 69 fail: 27 Failed tests: [ ... ] mips:mips_malta_s

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected)

2016-03-19 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 03/16/2016 03:17 PM, Qais Yousef wrote: On 16/03/2016 20:27, Qais Yousef wrote: On 16/03/2016 13:22, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:17:13PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +, Qais Yousef wrote: Hi Guenter, [ ... ] Qemu test results:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected)

2016-03-19 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 03/16/2016 03:17 PM, Qais Yousef wrote: On 16/03/2016 20:27, Qais Yousef wrote: On 16/03/2016 13:22, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:17:13PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +, Qais Yousef wrote: Hi Guenter, [ ... ] Qemu test results:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected)

2016-03-19 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:17:13PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +, Qais Yousef wrote: > > Hi Guenter, > > [ ... ] > > > > > >>Qemu test results: > > >> total: 96 pass: 69 fail: 27 > > >>Failed tests: > > >[ ... ] > > >> mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig > > >I

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected)

2016-03-19 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 03/16/2016 10:25 PM, Qais Yousef wrote: [ ... ] Yeah it is assumed that a Malta should always have a GIC and no one got around to fix this in qemu yet. I can only improve on the patch to do if (!ipidomain && nr_cpu_ids == 1) return 0; Which is more generic way to do it. I th

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected)

2016-03-18 Thread Qais Yousef
On 16/03/2016 20:27, Qais Yousef wrote: On 16/03/2016 13:22, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:17:13PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +, Qais Yousef wrote: Hi Guenter, [ ... ] Qemu test results: total: 96 pass: 69 fail: 27 Failed tests

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected)

2016-03-15 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +, Qais Yousef wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On 15/03/2016 05:26, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 07:37:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:40:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>>Hi all, > >>> > >>>Changes since 201

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected)

2016-03-15 Thread Qais Yousef
Hi Guenter, On 15/03/2016 05:26, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 07:37:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:40:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20160311: The vfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. I also applied a patch fo

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 14 (mips qemu failure bisected)

2016-03-14 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 07:37:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:40:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20160311: > > > > The vfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. I also applied a > > patch for a known runtime bug. > > > > T