Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25 (objtool warnings(4))

2020-07-02 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 09:49:51AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 6/24/20 11:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20200624: > > > > on x86_64: > > kernel/exit.o: warning: objtool: __x64_sys_exit_group()+0x14: unreachable > instruction > kernel/cred.o: warning: objt

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25 (objtool warnings(4))

2020-06-25 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 6/24/20 11:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200624: > on x86_64: kernel/exit.o: warning: objtool: __x64_sys_exit_group()+0x14: unreachable instruction kernel/cred.o: warning: objtool: override_creds()+0x4b: unreachable instruction fs/btrfs/extent_io.o: warning: o

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25 (efi_64.c)

2018-06-25 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 06/24/2018 10:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20180622: > on x86_64: (randconfig) CC arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.o In file included from ../include/linux/kernel.h:10:0, from ../arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c:21: ../arch/x86/platform/efi/efi

Re: net/netfilter/ipset: work around gcc-4.4.4 initializer bug (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25)

2015-06-25 Thread Jozsef Kadlecsik
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Changes since 20150624: > > > > The net-next tree lost its build failure. > > > $ git checkout -b akpm remotes/origin/akpm/master > > Applying: net/netfilter/ipset: work around gcc-4

Re: net/netfilter/ipset: work around gcc-4.4.4 initializer bug (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25)

2015-06-25 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Changes since 20150624: > > The net-next tree lost its build failure. > $ git checkout -b akpm remotes/origin/akpm/master > Applying: net/netfilter/ipset: work around gcc-4.4.4 initializer bug I can confirm this patch (which I couldn't

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25

2013-06-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Sedat, All, > > On 2013-06-25 11:26 +0200, Sedat Dilek spake thusly: >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN >> wrote: >> > On Tuesday 25 June 2013 10:55:20 Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Not sure what's going on, but I get this with

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25 [ kbuild or rapidio? ]

2013-06-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Sedat, All, > > On 2013-06-25 11:28 +0200, Sedat Dilek spake thusly: >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Sedat Dilek >> > wrote: > [--SNIP--] >> >> Not sure what's going on, but I

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25

2013-06-25 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Sedat, All, On 2013-06-25 11:26 +0200, Sedat Dilek spake thusly: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN > wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 June 2013 10:55:20 Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> Not sure what's going on, but I get this with today's Linux-Next. > >> ( Yesterday's next-20130624 was OK. ) >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25 [ kbuild or rapidio? ]

2013-06-25 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Sedat, All, On 2013-06-25 11:28 +0200, Sedat Dilek spake thusly: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: [--SNIP--] > >> Not sure what's going on, but I get this with today's Linux-Next. > >> ( Yesterday's next-20130624 was

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25

2013-06-25 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Michal, All, [Sorry for duplicates, I inadvertently sent HTML] On Tuesday 25 June 2013 11:21:53 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > On Tuesday 25 June 2013 10:55:20 Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Not sure what's going on, but I get this with today's Linux-Next. > > ( Yesterday's next-20130624 was OK. ) > > > > $ LAN

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25

2013-06-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Michal Marek wrote: > On 25.6.2013 11:26, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN >> wrote: >> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a11650e11093ed57dca78bf16e7836517c599098 >> >>> - for trista

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25

2013-06-25 Thread Michal Marek
On 25.6.2013 11:26, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN > wrote: > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a11650e11093ed57dca78bf16e7836517c599098 > >> - for tristate choices, it is possible to select zero, one or more of the

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25 [ kbuild or rapidio? ]

2013-06-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130624: >>> >>> The vfs tree lost its build failure. >>> >>> The net-next tree gained a

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25

2013-06-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Sedat, All, > > On Tuesday 25 June 2013 10:55:20 Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Not sure what's going on, but I get this with today's Linux-Next. >> ( Yesterday's next-20130624 was OK. ) >> >> $ LANG=C LC_ALL=C yes "" | make oldconfig && LANG=C LC_A

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25

2013-06-25 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Sedat, All, On Tuesday 25 June 2013 10:55:20 Sedat Dilek wrote: > Not sure what's going on, but I get this with today's Linux-Next. > ( Yesterday's next-20130624 was OK. ) > > $ LANG=C LC_ALL=C yes "" | make oldconfig && LANG=C LC_ALL=C make > silentoldconfig RapidIO support (RAPIDIO) [Y/n/?] y

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25 [ kbuild or rapidio? ]

2013-06-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130624: >> >> The vfs tree lost its build failure. >> >> The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. >> >> The usb tree gained a confl

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 25

2013-06-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130624: > > The vfs tree lost its build failure. > > The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. > > The usb tree gained a conflict against the devicetree tree. > > The staging tree lost its buil