Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-26 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 27/01/2017 (Fri 00:08) Stafford Horne wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:45:15PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:37:11AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (M

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-26 Thread Stafford Horne
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:45:15PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:37:11AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne > > wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-26 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 26/01/2017 (Thu 06:22) Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/25/2017 09:38 PM, Stafford Horne wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >>>[Re: linux-next:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-26 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 01/25/2017 09:38 PM, Stafford Horne wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote: [...] Are all of these builds using the tests from

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-25 Thread Stafford Horne
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:37:11AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne > wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]? > > Not using any spe

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-25 Thread Stafford Horne
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne > > wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > Are al

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-25 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote: [...] Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]? Not using any specific tests, other than compiling allmodconfig and defconfig. If so and no

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-25 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote: [...] > > Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]? Not using any specific tests, other than compiling allmodconfig and defconfig. > > If so and no one is working on openri

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-23 Thread Stafford Horne
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:42:45AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20170118: > > > > The audit tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > > > The tip tree gained a conflict against the security tree.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-19 Thread Stafford Horne
Hi Paul, On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:42:45AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20170118: > > > > The audit tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > > > The tip tree gained a conflict against the secu

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

2017-01-19 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20170118: > > The audit tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The tip tree gained a conflict against the security tree. > > The rcu tree gained a semantic conflict against the net-next tree for > which