Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the rcu tree

2021-01-12 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:03:56AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commits > > 32678deac9cd ("timer: Report ignored local enqueue in nohz mode") > 8beeef08bd76 ("entry: Report local wake up on resched blind zone while > resuming to user") > 7b3f45a1ad1f ("sched: Report local w

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the rcu tree

2020-06-21 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 08:06:32AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commits > > aa56127d9ac5 ("rcu/trace: Use gp_seq_req in acceleration's rcu_grace_period > tracepoint") > 63222f379b92 ("rcu/trace: Print negative GP numbers correctly") > > are missing a Signed-off-by from their

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the rcu tree

2020-05-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:01:48PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:43:17AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > Commits > > > > b2998782ded4 ("Documentation/litmus-tests: Clarify about the RCU > > pre-initialization test") > > 663f9202eb8a ("Documentation

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the rcu tree

2020-05-14 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:43:17AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > Commits > > b2998782ded4 ("Documentation/litmus-tests: Clarify about the RCU > pre-initialization test") > 663f9202eb8a ("Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's README into > top-level one") > f5eff20366f6 ("

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the rcu tree

2018-06-26 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:04:09AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Commit > > aa838e0b70e1 ("MAINTAINERS: Add Daniel Lustig as an LKMM reviewer") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. Will fix, apologies! I must have lost the '-s' argument to "git am". > Please so