Re: kernel BUG at inode.c:654!

2001-05-28 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
> Lovely... It's one of the long lists and these asserts (lines 650 and 654) > are exactly what would happen if it was corrupted at some place. OTOH, it > may be for real - i.e. real inodes in wrong state getting on the list, rather > than corrupted pointer. You were right, corrupted pointer. It

Re: kernel BUG at inode.c:654!

2001-05-26 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > Hi! > > That's what my server, wich is running 2.4.5, was shouting when I pluged in > my laptop at the console (ttyS0), all I could do was copy the output I was > seeing on minicom to a file, after rebooting I saw that the kernel had left