On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> kcalloc does have value, in that it's a nice api to avoid multiplication
> overflows. Just for "1" it's indeed not the most useful API.
Roman Zippel writes:
This would imply a similiar kmalloc() would be useful as well.
Second, how relevant is it
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 11:37 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> BTW we already have 420 "kcalloc(1, ...)" user and 41 without the 1
> argument, most of them are in sound, which introduced it in first place.
> Can we please deprecate that function before it spreads any further?
Arjan van de Ven writes
2 matches
Mail list logo
