On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:28:36PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> I believe that Netfilter will do this for you.
a) that'll require 2.4.x
b) that'll require 2.4.x recompilation
c) that will definitely not solve all the problems arise
thanks, anyway
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:40:06AM -0500, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> - Received message begins Here -
> > Byt how should I restrict him open socket and send some data (my IP,
> > for example) somewhere ??
I believe that Netfilter will do this for you. Look at:
Owner match support
- Received message begins Here -
>
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 09:57:25PM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote:
>
> >> Is it possible by any means to isolate any given process, so that
> >> it'll be unable to crash system.
> > You just gave a nice description what an OS kernel should do :)
>
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 09:57:25PM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote:
>> Is it possible by any means to isolate any given process, so that
>> it'll be unable to crash system.
> You just gave a nice description what an OS kernel should do :)
* Sigh * :-)
> > Please, supply ANY suggestions.
> >
> > My idea
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 12:37:55PM +0300, Bohdan Vlasyuk wrote:
> Is it possible by any means to isolate any given process, so that
> it'll be unable to crash system. Suppose all the process needs is
> stdin, stdout, and CPU time. Can Linux guarantee that given process
> won't hurt system stabilit
5 matches
Mail list logo