On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:12:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Where's the benefit in switching ipcs over to using /proc?
>>
>> procfs reads are probably slower than the syscalls?
>
> 32bit userspace and 64bit kernel (RHEL ppc64), it seems m
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:12:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Where's the benefit in switching ipcs over to using /proc?
>
> procfs reads are probably slower than the syscalls?
32bit userspace and 64bit kernel (RHEL ppc64), it seems more reliable
read from /proc than use the syscalls.
I gu
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:31:08 +
Sami Kerola wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While back I started to look how to get util-linux ipcs(1) tool to
> read values from /proc instead of using IPC multiplex functions. Most
> of the data ipcs(1) is interested is available in /proc, but there are
> few exceptions
3 matches
Mail list logo