>> But I proposed an other source code layout for useful reasons.
>
> I think there is a (hidden) cost of having pure cleanup patches:
> they make backporting fixes harder (across the cleanup)
There the usual software development consequences to consider
if you dare to change the source code at a
Hello,
> Maybe …
> But I proposed an other source code layout for useful reasons.
I think there is a (hidden) cost of having pure cleanup patches:
they make backporting fixes harder (across the cleanup)
stylistic changes must have a clear benefit, readability is subjective,
consistency per se d
> In the second case, the jump backwards just makes the code harder
> to read than it currently is.
Maybe …
But I proposed an other source code layout for useful reasons.
> There is no firm rule about error handling in one place.
There are some design options available.
> If it leads to more
3 matches
Mail list logo
