Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-06-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:55:32AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > BTW (not related to gmail): > > Are there any news regarding the buggy 451 handling in zmailer I'm > > reporting again and again that regularly results in every single > >

Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-06-04 Thread Matti Aarnio
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:55:32AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > BTW (not related to gmail): > > Are there any news regarding the buggy 451 handling in zmailer I'm > > reporting again and again that regularly results in every single > >

Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-06-04 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > BTW (not related to gmail): > Are there any news regarding the buggy 451 handling in zmailer I'm > reporting again and again that regularly results in every single > linux-kernel message sent to me being delayed by up to 13 hours? Er, you'

Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-05-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:35:11PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0400, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote: > > > In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity > > > analysis I got following results: > > > > > >2101 gmail.com > > > 49 googlemail.com

Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-05-07 Thread Matti Aarnio
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:18:21PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:55:55PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: ... > > The gmail is so popular, that with their somewhat rudimentary > > inbound MTA software this kind of recipient masses take horrible > > time to feed in... Mere 0

Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-05-07 Thread David Miller
From: Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 18:35:11 +0300 > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0400, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote: > > > In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity > > > analysis I got following results: > > > > > >2101 gmail.com > > > 49

Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-05-07 Thread Martin Bligh
Satyam Sharma wrote: On 5/7/07, John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity > analysis I got following results: > >2101 gmail.com > 49 googlemail.com > 46 gmx.de > 41 redhat.com > 33 yahoo.com > 23 sus

Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-05-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:55:55PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: > In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity > analysis I got following results: > >2101 gmail.com > 49 googlemail.com > 46 gmx.de > 41 redhat.com > 33 yahoo.com > 23 suse.de > 22 gmx.net

Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-05-07 Thread Satyam Sharma
On 5/7/07, John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity > analysis I got following results: > >2101 gmail.com > 49 googlemail.com > 46 gmx.de > 41 redhat.com > 33 yahoo.com > 23 suse.de > 22 gmx.net

Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-05-07 Thread Matti Aarnio
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0400, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote: > > In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity > > analysis I got following results: > > > >2101 gmail.com > > 49 googlemail.com > > 46 gmx.de > How about some elitism here? Dedicate a certai

Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

2007-05-07 Thread John Anthony Kazos Jr.
> In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity > analysis I got following results: > >2101 gmail.com > 49 googlemail.com > 46 gmx.de > 41 redhat.com > 33 yahoo.com > 23 suse.de > 22 gmx.net > 21 comcast.net > > > The gmail is so popular, that