(cough) doesn't reproduce on my 2.95.2...
[asuardi@princess misc]$ vi bug.c
(cut'n'paste from Andries' email)
[asuardi@princess misc]$ gcc -Wall -O2 -o bug bug.c
[asuardi@princess misc]$ ./bug
0x0
[asuardi@princess misc]$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2/specs
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Tom Rini wrote:
> Well, now that there is a testcase, has anyone sent this on to the relevant
> gcc lists? (The CCs I saw haven't)
Yes. I've just sent a fix to gcc-patches.
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a me
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 11:47:04PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 02:57:45AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > but in the meantime there is good confirmation.
> > > This really is a bug in gcc 2.95.2.
> >
> > ...
[Chris Wedgwood]
> taking away -O2 is a 'fix' for now... not a very good one though.
Not if you want function inlining to work. The kernel *won't compile*
without optimization.
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PR
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 02:57:45AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > but in the meantime there is good confirmation.
> > This really is a bug in gcc 2.95.2.
>
> ... RedHat's GCC snapshot "2.96" handles this case just fine.
Now, if you can isola
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 02:57:45AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but in the meantime there is good confirmation.
> This really is a bug in gcc 2.95.2.
... RedHat's GCC snapshot "2.96" handles this case just fine.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
th
6 matches
Mail list logo
