Re: gcc-2.95.3

2001-04-18 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
cx863877-d% gcc --version 2.95.3 cx863877-d% uptime 3:26pm up 14 days, 15:15, 15 users, load average: 2.01, 2.01, 2.00 cx863877-d% uname -a Linux cx863877-d.cv1.sdca.home.com 2.4.3 #3 SMP Wed Apr 4 00:06:17 PDT 2001 i686 unknown No problems at all :) On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Jeff Chua wrote: >

Re: gcc-2.95.3

2001-04-06 Thread Jochen Striepe
Hi, On 06 Apr 2001, Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3? > > I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it. I'm using gcc-2.95.3 for kernel compilation on latest 2.4.x since it's out. Never had any Problem. Lin

Re: gcc-2.95.3

2001-04-05 Thread Mike Castle
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:49:51AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: > > Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3? > > I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it. I've built and using 2.4.2 with 2.95.3 with no issues. [I should say, with no more issues than I have normally

Re: gcc-2.95.3

2001-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
You should be ok :) On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Jeff Chua wrote: > > Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3? > > I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it. > > > Thanks, > Jeff > [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li