Re: fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in usb

2005-04-07 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 2:38 pm, Pavel Machek wrote: > It seems to me that USB stack still needs some u32-vs-pm_message_t > changes (in rc2-mm1): > > Could you apply them? I see someone changed the requirements for platform_device too ... :) This patch is mostly NOPs, but many of them tromp on

Re: fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in usb

2005-04-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Actually, please do NOT apply this. It conflicts with other > patches, which have been in the past few MM releases, have > also been circulated on linux-usb-devel, and actually address > some of the bugs which crept in as things have changed around > the USB stack. It seems to me that USB

Re: fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in usb

2005-04-03 Thread David Brownell
Actually, please do NOT apply this. It conflicts with other patches, which have been in the past few MM releases, have also been circulated on linux-usb-devel, and actually address some of the bugs which crept in as things have changed around the USB stack. - Dave - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: fix-u32-vs-pm_message_t-in-usb

2005-03-18 Thread Pavel Machek
On Pá 18-03-05 15:53:13, Andrew Morton wrote: > Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Care to just rediff off of 2.6.12-rc1? Then we can hopefully get these > > > changes in :) > > > > I can do the rediff tommorow. I just hope there are not some other > > changis waiting in -mm to

Re: fix-u32-vs-pm_message_t-in-usb

2005-03-18 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > Care to just rediff off of 2.6.12-rc1? Then we can hopefully get these > > > changes in :) > > > > I can do the rediff tommorow. I just hope there are not some other > > changis waiting in -mm to spoil this ;-). > > I have a boatload of these darn pm_message_t patches floating abou

Re: fix-u32-vs-pm_message_t-in-usb

2005-03-18 Thread Andrew Morton
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Care to just rediff off of 2.6.12-rc1? Then we can hopefully get these > > changes in :) > > I can do the rediff tommorow. I just hope there are not some other > changis waiting in -mm to spoil this ;-). I have a boatload of these darn pm_message_

Re: fix-u32-vs-pm_message_t-in-usb

2005-03-18 Thread Pavel Machek
On Pá 18-03-05 13:43:36, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 02:08:31PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > This patch has been spitting warnings: > > > > > > drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c:838: warning: initialization from > > > incompatible pointer type > > > drivers/usb/host/ohci-p

Re: fix-u32-vs-pm_message_t-in-usb

2005-03-18 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 02:08:31PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > This patch has been spitting warnings: > > > > drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c:838: warning: initialization from incompatible > > pointer type > > drivers/usb/host/ohci-pci.c:191: warning: initialization from incompatible > >

Re: fix-u32-vs-pm_message_t-in-usb

2005-03-11 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > This patch has been spitting warnings: > > drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c:838: warning: initialization from incompatible > pointer type > drivers/usb/host/ohci-pci.c:191: warning: initialization from incompatible > pointer type > > Because hc_driver.suspend() takes a u32 as its second arg.

Re: fix-u32-vs-pm_message_t-in-usb

2005-03-11 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > This patch has been spitting warnings: > > drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c:838: warning: initialization from incompatible > pointer type > drivers/usb/host/ohci-pci.c:191: warning: initialization from incompatible > pointer type > > Because hc_driver.suspend() takes a u32 as its second arg.

Re: Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in USB [was Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes]

2005-02-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > This fixes (part of) u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in USB. It should > > cause no code changes. Please apply, > > Large portions of this patch are already in my tree (and hence the -mm > tree.) Care to rediff against the latest -mm and resend the patch? (Sorry for the delay). Yes, mos

Re: Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in USB [was Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes]

2005-02-17 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:39:35AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > This fixes (part of) u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in USB. It should > cause no code changes. Please apply, Large portions of this patch are already in my tree (and hence the -mm tree.) Care to rediff against the latest -mm