On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 08:36:18AM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Andreas Hartmann
> > wrote:
> [...]
> >See __vfs_read().
> >Your module most not rely on such internals.
>
> Thanks for your hint to th
Am 28.06.2015 um 08:36 schrieb Andreas Hartmann:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Andreas Hartmann
>> wrote:
> [...]
>> See __vfs_read().
>> Your module most not rely on such internals.
>
> Thanks for your hint to the function which
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Andreas Hartmann
wrote:
[...]
See __vfs_read().
Your module most not rely on such internals.
Thanks for your hint to the function which exists since 3.19.
Is there a site out there which lists all re
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Andreas Hartmann
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Given is a module like the following snippet running fine w/ Linux 4.0
> and ext4 fs - but doesn't work w/ Linux 4.1 because f->f_op->read is not
> defined any more (= NULL). Is this the intended behavior now?
See __vfs_read().
4 matches
Mail list logo