On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 04:16:52PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Hi, Jaegeuk,
>
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 00:58 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Huang,
> >
> > It occurs a merge conflict.
> > Please check the patch.
>
> Sorry, my fault. I think I need to base my patch on f2fs tree instead
> of lates
Hi, Jaegeuk,
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 00:58 -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Huang,
>
> It occurs a merge conflict.
> Please check the patch.
Sorry, my fault. I think I need to base my patch on f2fs tree instead
of latest Linus' tree?
> Anyway, IMO, it needs to place f2fs_balance_fs somewhere in ge
Hi Huang,
It occurs a merge conflict.
Please check the patch.
Anyway, IMO, it needs to place f2fs_balance_fs somewhere in get_data_block.
Thanks,
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:46:28PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Otherwise, if a large amount of direct IO writes were done, the
> segment allocation ma
3 matches
Mail list logo