Re: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-19 Thread Alan Cox
> want to try that. For this reason I also don't believe the problem is the > any of the emu10k1 I dont think its the emu10k1 itself. Nor does it seem to be the init function not being called (folks report seeing the init messages in both cases). I need to trace the init order some time - To uns

Re: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-19 Thread Juri Haberland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > All reports I've seen mention that the driver works fine if compiled as a > module. You may > want to try that. For this reason I also don't believe the problem is the > any of the emu10k1 > source files (which you diff'ed), unfortunately I haven't had much > time/mea

Re: emu10k1 broken in 2.2.18

2000-12-19 Thread rui . sousa
All reports I've seen mention that the driver works fine if compiled as a module. You may want to try that. For this reason I also don't believe the problem is the any of the emu10k1 source files (which you diff'ed), unfortunately I haven't had much time/means to test this since I'm without a hom