uot;Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Micah Gorrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andrey Savochkin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Romain Kang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Craig I. Hagan"
&
On Tuesday 30 January 2001 08:14, Micah Gorrell wrote:
> I have been running 2.2 on many machines since its release and have updated
> to the latest version of 2.2 many times. All of these machines have an
> eepro100 and I never saw a single problem with any of them. I updated most
> of my machi
-
From: "Andrey Savochkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Micah Gorrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Romain Kang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Craig I. Hagan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, J
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:06:11AM -0700, Micah Gorrell wrote:
> As stated in a number of previous messages to this list many people have had
> serious problems with the eepro100 driver in 2.4. These problems where not
> there in 2.2 and it is not a select few machines showing this so I very much
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Sergey Kubushin wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> > Two of my Linux machines use the Intel Ethernet controller on the
> > motherboard. These are both SMP machines. I have never, ever, had
> > any problems with the eepro100 driver that handles these
Sergey Kubushin wrote:
>
> The older chips (e.g. 82557) work fine. The problem arises when you have the
> newer 82559's. They do work, however, if the power management for eepro100
> is enabled in kernel config. It definitely means that those chips are
> underinitialized (or overinitialized :)) w
aig I. Hagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Romain Kang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, January 29, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: eepro100 - Linux vs. FreeBSD
>On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Craig I. Hagan wrote:
>
>> > One approach to the endl
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> Two of my Linux machines use the Intel Ethernet controller on the
> motherboard. These are both SMP machines. I have never, ever, had
> any problems with the eepro100 driver that handles these chips.
>
> I spite of the fact that the driver loops in
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Craig I. Hagan wrote:
> > One approach to the endless eepro100 headaches would be to port
> > the FreeBSD if_fxp driver to Linux. After all, drivers have been
> > ported between these OSs before; e.g., the aic7xxx SCSI adapter.
> > However, I see no evidence that this has be
> One approach to the endless eepro100 headaches would be to port
> the FreeBSD if_fxp driver to Linux. After all, drivers have been
> ported between these OSs before; e.g., the aic7xxx SCSI adapter.
> However, I see no evidence that this has been attempted. Can
> someone tell me what I'm obviou
10 matches
Mail list logo
