Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout

2001-06-22 Thread Dionysius Wilson Almeida
Hi Andrey, I'm attaching the log file.. please let me know if u need other details. -Wilson * Andrey Savochkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 06:36:03PM -0700, Dionysius Wilson Almeida wrote: > > I tried inserting a udelay(1) and increasing the count ..but > > the same beh

Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout

2001-06-22 Thread Andrey Savochkin
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 06:36:03PM -0700, Dionysius Wilson Almeida wrote: > I tried inserting a udelay(1) and increasing the count ..but > the same behaviour. > > any clues ? btw, i've been able to compile the redhat 7.1 intel e100 > driver and it works fine for my card. Your problem is differ

Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout

2001-06-21 Thread Dionysius Wilson Almeida
I tried inserting a udelay(1) and increasing the count ..but the same behaviour. any clues ? btw, i've been able to compile the redhat 7.1 intel e100 driver and it works fine for my card. -Wilson * Dionysius Wilson Almeida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > No..that was pretty much what i saw in th

Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout

2001-06-21 Thread Masaru Kawashima
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:37:47 -0500 John Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > errors. Think the patch with the udelay() will still work? In my system, the patch with the udelay() is working. -- Masaru Kawashima - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout

2001-06-21 Thread Masaru Kawashima
Hi, again! I'ts me, Masaru Kawashima, from home. I'm sorry I made a stupid mistake last time! This time, I promise you that I attach the proper patch for linux/drivers/net/eepro100.c. (running version) On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:19:39 +0900 Masaru Kawashima > wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 20 Jun 2001

Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout

2001-06-21 Thread John Madden
> Dionysius Wilson Almeida > >wrote: > > Jun 20 16:14:07 debianlap kernel: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout! > > Jun 20 16:14:38 debianlap last message repeated 5 times > > I saw the same message. > > The comment before wait_for_cmd_done() function in > linux/drivers/net/eepro100.c says: > /

Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout

2001-06-21 Thread Masaru Kawashima
Hi! On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:31:34 -0700 Dionysius Wilson Almeida > wrote: > Jun 20 16:14:07 debianlap kernel: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout! > Jun 20 16:14:38 debianlap last message repeated 5 times I saw the same message. The comment before wait_for_cmd_done() function in linux/drivers/ne

Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout

2001-06-21 Thread Rafael Martinez
---Reply to mail from Dionysius Wilson Almeida about eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout > No..that was pretty much what i saw in the logs. > > I see wait_for_cmd_done timeout being the only one being repeated in the > logs > The same here with 2.4.1 and 2.4.3. Rafael Martinez - To unsubscr

Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout

2001-06-20 Thread Dionysius Wilson Almeida
No..that was pretty much what i saw in the logs. I see wait_for_cmd_done timeout being the only one being repeated in the logs -Wilson ` * Andrey Savochkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > What was the first error message from the driver? > NETDEV WATCHDOG report went before wait_for_cmd_done timeou

Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout

2001-06-20 Thread Andrey Savochkin
What was the first error message from the driver? NETDEV WATCHDOG report went before wait_for_cmd_done timeout and is more important. I wonder if you had some other messages before the watchdog one. Andrey On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 04:31:34PM -0700, Dionysius Wilson Almeida wrote: > And t