Re: Fwd: Re: e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-09 Thread Kok, Auke
> >>>> To be honest, I do not understand why the e1000e driver failed to recognize >>>> the NIC when I tried. At least, I noticed the correct device ID is defined >>>> in drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h: >>>> >>>> #define E1000_DEV_ID_82573L

Re: Fwd: Re: e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-09 Thread Ray Lee
erstand why the e1000e driver failed to recognize > >> the NIC when I tried. At least, I noticed the correct device ID is defined > >> in drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h: > >> > >> #define E1000_DEV_ID_82573L0x109A > >> > >> Any help

Re: Fwd: Re: e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-09 Thread Kok, Auke
ined >> in drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h: >> >> #define E1000_DEV_ID_82573L0x109A >> >> Any help is appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Martin >> >> -- Forwarded Message -- >> >> Subject: Re: e100

Re: Fwd: Re: e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-09 Thread Martin Rogge
0x109A > > Any help is appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Martin > > ------ Forwarded Message -- > > Subject: Re: e1000 1sec latency problem > Date: Thursday 07 February 2008 > From: Martin Rogge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To:

Re: e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Martin Rogge
Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > I have the famous e1000 latency problems: Hi, I have the same problem with my Thinkpad T60. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ping arnold PING arnold (192.168.158.6) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=49.7 ms 64 bytes from arnold

Re: e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Max Krasnyansky
Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > I have the famous e1000 latency problems: > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.