Hi all,
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:33:15 -0800 Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> * Tony Battersby [181206 16:13]:
> > On 12/6/18 10:51 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > >> Here is the prototype:
> > >>
> > >> void dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *pool, void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma);
> > >>
> > >> With the old code,
* Tony Battersby [181206 16:13]:
> On 12/6/18 10:51 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> >> Here is the prototype:
> >>
> >> void dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *pool, void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma);
> >>
> >> With the old code, the 'dma' value had to be correct for use with
> >> pool_find_page(), or else you w
On 12/6/18 10:51 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Here is the prototype:
>>
>> void dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *pool, void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma);
>>
>> With the old code, the 'dma' value had to be correct for use with
>> pool_find_page(), or else you would get an error. If the 'vaddr' value
>> was
On 06/12/2018 15:11, Tony Battersby wrote:
On 12/6/18 4:25 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 02:31, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Hi,
Looks like with commit 26abe88e830d ("mm/dmapool.c: improve scalability
of dma_pool_free()") I'm now getting spammed with lots of "(bad vaddr)"
on at
On 12/6/18 4:25 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 02:31, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looks like with commit 26abe88e830d ("mm/dmapool.c: improve scalability
>> of dma_pool_free()") I'm now getting spammed with lots of "(bad vaddr)"
>> on at least omap4 pandaboard, see be
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 02:31, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Looks like with commit 26abe88e830d ("mm/dmapool.c: improve scalability
> of dma_pool_free()") I'm now getting spammed with lots of "(bad vaddr)"
> on at least omap4 pandaboard, see below.
>
> Any ideas what might be going wrong?
>
> Re
6 matches
Mail list logo
