On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:45:15PM +0100, Milutin wrote:
> Hello Greg,
> I have a problem with packets coming from tcpdump to buffer of NIC. I need
> the probability density of packets trip time from tcpdump program to arriving
> in buffer of NIC from where they are sent to network. Could you tell
raja wrote:
> Hi,
> Would you please tell me how to write a function that generates a
> delay of Less than a sec.(ie for 1 milli se or one microsec etc).
See udelay() (follow the trail from: include/linux/delay.h)
=
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Foru
On 8/24/05, Vladimir V. Saveliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> raja wrote:
> > Hi,
> >Would you please tell me how to write a function that generates a
> > delay of Less than a sec.(ie for 1 milli se or one microsec etc).
> >
>
> Maybe you could use: linux/kernel/timer.c:schedule_tim
Hello
raja wrote:
> Hi,
>Would you please tell me how to write a function that generates a
> delay of Less than a sec.(ie for 1 milli se or one microsec etc).
>
Maybe you could use: linux/kernel/timer.c:schedule_timeout()
> Thankingyou,
> Raja
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 07:20, Bouchard, Sebastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of writing a linux driver and I have a question in
> regards to tasklet :
>
> Is it ok to have large delay "udelay(1000);" in the tasklet?
>
> If not, what should I do?
>
If the hardware can tolerate longer a l
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Davide Rossetti wrote:
Bouchard, Sebastien wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of writing a linux driver and I have a question in
regards to tasklet :
Is it ok to have large delay "udelay(1000);" in the tasklet?
If not, what should I do?
Please send the answer to me personally (I'm n
On 30/03/2005 12:50:01 linux-kernel-owner wrote:
>> I'd be interested in the answer as well. I have a driver which does
>> udelay(100), so no 1000 but anyway, and of course I end up having the
X86_64
>> kernel happily crying. I'm moving to a little state-machine to allow
for a
>> multi-pass appr
> I'd be interested in the answer as well. I have a driver which does
> udelay(100), so no 1000 but anyway, and of course I end up having the X86_64
> kernel happily crying. I'm moving to a little state-machine to allow for a
> multi-pass approach instead of busy-polling..
> regards
schedule_timeo
Bouchard, Sebastien wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of writing a linux driver and I have a question in
regards to tasklet :
Is it ok to have large delay "udelay(1000);" in the tasklet?
If not, what should I do?
Please send the answer to me personally (I'm not subscribe to the mailling
list) :
I'
"Generally that message means you have not compiled or installed the
module for your network card, or the "alias eth0 ..." line in
/etc/conf.modules is wrong or missing. If your system worked with the
old kernel, the former is more likely."
I did not make any changes in me
, 2001 7:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Rajeev Nigam
Subject: Re: Delay Function
you might want to use delay(usecs)..
Hubertus Franke
Enterprise Linux Group (Mgr), Linux Technology Center (Member Scalability)
, OS-PIC (Chair)
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(w) 914-945-2003(fax) 914-945-4425 TL
It may be possible that this is not the good choice...
but u can try ... schedule_timeout(timeout) function see kernel/sched.c for
more details about this function
Amol
Rajeev Nigam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/24/2001 03:29:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Amol Lad/HSS)
Subje
Rajeev Nigam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/24/2001 03:29:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Amol Lad/HSS)
Subject: Delay Function
What function i have to use to put a delay in a driver at kernel mode
between reading from and writing to com port.
Looking forward for ur help.
Tha
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> And have identical bad problems with auth failures. Right now I've given up
> trying to make 2.4 and YP mix because my RH setup assumes NIS auth will fail
> fast during boot up scripts and it doesnt.
>
> Unfortunately for the quickfix folks, Dave is right abo
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Scott Laird wrote:
>
> Is syslog running correctly? When syslog screws up, it very frequently
> results in this sort of problem.
Indeed, or no DNS when talking remote logins.
Igmar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the b
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Scott Laird wrote:
>
> Is syslog running correctly? When syslog screws up, it very frequently
> results in this sort of problem.
>
I would guess that syslog is okay. I'm getting plenty of entries in my
various logs, along with a few boxes remote logging into this server.
A
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:01:26PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > It was intentionally changed because there is no way for the "ICMP
> > port unreachable" message coming back to be uniquely matched to that
> > UDP socket. It can reset sockets illegally in high load scenerios.
> >
> > Solaris and oth
Date:Mon, 8 Jan 2001 22:01:26 + (GMT)
From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Solaris and other systems act identically.
And have identical bad problems with auth failures.
Actually, I believe their sunrpc library uses an extended error
facility via the streams APIs that wo
> It was intentionally changed because there is no way for the "ICMP
> port unreachable" message coming back to be uniquely matched to that
> UDP socket. It can reset sockets illegally in high load scenerios.
>
> Solaris and other systems act identically.
And have identical bad problems with au
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:24:55 -0600
From: "M.H.VanLeeuwen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Was this behavior intentionally changed and why?
Looks like 2.2.X gives ECONNREFUSED, but 2.4.X doesn't and times out.
It was intentionally changed because there is no way for the "ICMP
port unreachable
Chris,
I reported the same thing on 11/19/00, whether this is a feature or bug for
2.4.X was not determined. Was this behavior intentionally changed and why?
Looks like 2.2.X gives ECONNREFUSED, but 2.4.X doesn't and times out.
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg13983.
Is syslog running correctly? When syslog screws up, it very frequently
results in this sort of problem.
Scott
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Chris Meadors wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>
> > check /etc/pam.d/login
>
> No pam.
>
> > Could be kerberos that is biting you, althrou
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> check /etc/pam.d/login
No pam.
> Could be kerberos that is biting you, althrough that doesn't explain the
> portmap story.
So no kerberos.
I just rebuilt the shadow suite (where my login comes from) to be on the
safe side. But the problem is stil
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Chris Meadors wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > This definitely seems like the classic "/etc/nsswitch.conf is told to
> > look for YP servers and you are not using YP", so have a look and fix
> > nsswitch.conf if this is in fact the problem.
>
> What
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>Date:Mon, 08 Jan 2001 18:39:34 +0500
>From: Ansari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I just installed Redhat 6.0. When i run "su" command it takes much
>time to apper passwd prompt. Its also taking much time in
>authentication after entering the passw
Date:Mon, 08 Jan 2001 18:39:34 +0500
From: Ansari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I just installed Redhat 6.0. When i run "su" command it takes much
time to apper passwd prompt. Its also taking much time in
authentication after entering the password.
This definitely seems like the cl
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> This definitely seems like the classic "/etc/nsswitch.conf is told to
> look for YP servers and you are not using YP", so have a look and fix
> nsswitch.conf if this is in fact the problem.
What I have never gotten, is why on my machines (no specific
27 matches
Mail list logo
