On Tuesday 27 March 2007 01:28, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Subsequent to that Con suggested testing a refactored RSDL patch. That
> patch seemed to work on the machine at hand, so tests have been
> submitted for all the affected machines.
>
> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/stai
Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
>
>> This is about the only place I can see the run_list is looked at unlocked.
>> Can
>> you see if this simple patch helps? The debug patch is unnecessary now.
>
> Tests queued with this patch. Will let you know.
That patch had no effect on the prob
Con Kolivas wrote:
> This is about the only place I can see the run_list is looked at unlocked. Can
> you see if this simple patch helps? The debug patch is unnecessary now.
Tests queued with this patch. Will let you know.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
On Monday 26 March 2007 08:49, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007 04:28, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > kernel/sched.c | 51
> > > +++ 1 file changed, 51
> > > insertions(+)
> >
> > 2.6.2
On Monday 26 March 2007 04:28, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > kernel/sched.c | 51
> > +++ 1 file changed, 51
> > insertions(+)
>
> 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 also fails for me.
>
> I tried pure 2.6.21-rc4-mm1, +h
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:28:57 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > kernel/sched.c | 51 +++
> > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 also fails for me.
>
> I tri
On 3/24/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kernel/sched.c | 51 +++
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
2.6.21-rc4-mm1 also fails for me.
I tried pure 2.6.21-rc4-mm1, +hotfixes, +hotfixes+rsdl33 and at last
also added above debug patch.
Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Saturday 24 March 2007 08:45, Con Kolivas wrote:
>> On Friday 23 March 2007 23:28, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>> Andy Whitcroft wrote:
Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Friday 23 March 2007 05:17, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>> Ok, I have yet a third x86_64 machine is is blowing up
8 matches
Mail list logo