Hi!
> > Well, you could set stripe size to 512B; that way, RAID-5 would be
> > *very* slow, but it should have same characteristics as normal disc
> > w.r.t. crash. Unrelated data would not be lost, and you'd either get
> > old data or new data...
>
> When you lose a disk during recovery you can
> Well, you could set stripe size to 512B; that way, RAID-5 would be
> *very* slow, but it should have same characteristics as normal disc
> w.r.t. crash. Unrelated data would not be lost, and you'd either get
> old data or new data...
When you lose a disk during recovery you can still lose
unrela
Hi!
> > The nasty part there is that it can affect completely unrelated
> > data too (on a traditional disk you normally only lose the data
> > that is currently being written) because of of the relationship
> > between stripes on different disks.
Well, you could set stripe size to 512B; that way
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I disagree. When not working in degraded mode, it's absolutely reasonable
> > to e.g. use only the non-parity data. A crash with raid5 is in no way
>
> Yep. But when you go into degraded mode during the crash recov
4 matches
Mail list logo
