On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:00 AM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> Kris Borer suggested a SmPL script which can generate (only) patches
> so far by the usual application of the Coccinelle software.
> I assume that this approach was limited just because Julia Lawall
> indicated that this functionality wou
>> Can the check result display be more convenient from the semantic
>> patch script interface in comparison to the other tool?
>
> -ENOPARSE. More detail please.
Kris Borer suggested a SmPL script which can generate (only) patches
so far by the usual application of the Coccinelle software.
I as
On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 13:55 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > Would you like to consider also the reuse of SmPL variables
> > > like "org" and "report"?
> >
> > I think that there is no point for these things, because checkpatch
> > already gives warnings about this issue.
>
> Can the check r
>> Would you like to consider also the reuse of SmPL variables
>> like "org" and "report"?
>
> I think that there is no point for these things, because checkpatch
> already gives warnings about this issue.
Can the check result display be more convenient from the semantic
patch script interface in
4 matches
Mail list logo