On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 06:58:29AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This kind of stuff is just sick. Better let them play with their research
> OS for this kind of thing :)
sick, research, what's the difference? :-)
> In practice any non-trivial bug fix requires
> changes to global data struct
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:47:32AM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > i am talking about a clean/standard way to do such thing
> > (without overwrite the mem address of the function and replace it in a
> > dirty way...)
>
> k42 supports "dynamic hot-swap" and there's been some work done to
> bring
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:19:50PM +0200, Yitzchak Eidus wrote:
> is it possible to replace linux kernel internal functions such as
> schdule () to lets say my_schdule () in a run time with a module
> patch??? (so that every call in the kernel to schdule() will go to
> my_schdule()... ) ???
Not
On Nov 16 2006 20:29, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:19:50PM +0200, Yitzchak Eidus wrote:
>> is it possible to replace linux kernel internal functions such as
>> schdule () to lets say my_schdule () in a run time with a module
>> patch???
Nothing is impossible.
>> (so that every
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:19:50 +0200
"Yitzchak Eidus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is it possible to replace linux kernel internal functions such as
> schdule () to lets say my_schdule () in a run time with a module
> patch???
> (so that every call in the kernel to schdule() will go to my_schdule()
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:19:50PM +0200, Yitzchak Eidus wrote:
> is it possible to replace linux kernel internal functions such as
> schdule () to lets say my_schdule () in a run time with a module
> patch???
> (so that every call in the kernel to schdule() will go to my_schdule()... )
> ???
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
