On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 08:33:05PM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> > > The link order is wrong. So why not changing the link order then?
> >
> > I remember doing what the patch below does.
> > It didn't help.
>
> Hmm, m
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 08:33:05PM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> > The link order is wrong. So why not changing the link order then?
>
> I remember doing what the patch below does.
> It didn't help.
Hmm, maybe you had a typo?
> Did you try this patch?
Yes,
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> > In order to get my kernel to boot, I've made the following temporary
> > workaround patch. I'd be glad to hear about other ways of solving this.
>
> The link order is wrong. So why not changing the link order then?
I remember doing what the patch below
On Sat, Apr 21 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 02:17:18AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > One reason for this misdependency is that the IDE is initialized before
> > the cdrom driver, register_cdrom() gets called from inside the IDE
> > initialization functions. (ide_init() -> ide_in
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 02:17:18AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
> One reason for this misdependency is that the IDE is initialized before
> the cdrom driver, register_cdrom() gets called from inside the IDE
> initialization functions. (ide_init() -> ide_init_builtin_drivers() ->
> ide_cdrom_init() -> i
5 matches
Mail list logo