Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Gerd Knorr
> > Come to think of it .. then we'd start getting "buz drivers missing" > > reports. > > So what? > Refer them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we'll explain them how > to use the new zoran driver until it's in the official kernel... #warning "outdated, see http://whatever for current devel versions"

Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Ronald Bultje
On 2001.04.30 20:37:39 +0200 Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Buz.c doesnt work build or anything. Once the zoran merge is done it > will > > go away, until then I simply dont care. At least its obviously broken > right > > now > > Can't we just remove it t

Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > Buz.c doesnt work build or anything. Once the zoran merge is done it will > go away, until then I simply dont care. At least its obviously broken right > now Can't we just remove it then? Come to think of it .. then we'd start getting "buz drivers missing

Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Alan Cox
> I met follwing erros which was workarounded by put > define KMALLOC_MAXSIZE131072 > borrowed from af_unix.c of 2.4.3-ac14. But I'm convinced of this. > below lines were wrapped by me for readabilities' sake. Buz.c doesnt work build or anything. Once the zoran merge is done it will go aw

RE: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-28 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hi, >I met follwing erros which was workarounded by put >define KMALLOC_MAXSIZE 131072 >borrowed from af_unix.c of 2.4.3-ac14. But I'm convinced of >this. >below lines were wrapped by me for readabilities' sake. my fix in an earlier e-mail to the list explained that the proper way of fixing it i