Re: bk commits and dates

2005-03-10 Thread Olaf Hering
On Thu, Mar 10, Tom Rini wrote: > I've just been using sort by arrival as an imperfect, but still mostly Just procmail the stuff, if bk cant do it. :0 f * ^X-my-mailinglist-tag: bk-commits-head.vger.kernel.org | formail -i "Date: `env TZ=UTC date -R`" This doesnt he

Re: bk commits and dates

2005-03-10 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:11:45AM -0700, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 01:13 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Speaking strictly in terms of implementation, David Woodhouse's > > bk-commits mailer scripts could probably easily be tweaked to -not- set > > an explicit Date header on t

Re: bk commits and dates

2005-03-10 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Now, if James trigger scripts set the date of the email by the date of the > > commit, that sounds like a misfeature, but you'd better talk to James, not > > me, since he's the one doing that part.. > > Hah ok. Which James ? I was thin

Re: bk commits and dates

2005-03-10 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 01:13 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Speaking strictly in terms of implementation, David Woodhouse's > bk-commits mailer scripts could probably easily be tweaked to -not- set > an explicit Date header on the outgoing emails. > > It then becomes a matter of deciding whether thi

Re: bk commits and dates

2005-03-09 Thread Jeff Garzik
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:47 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tre

Re: bk commits and dates

2005-03-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:28 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it > > would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the > > commit messages for the csets

Re: bk commits and dates

2005-03-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:47 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100 > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it > > would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the >

Re: bk commits and dates

2005-03-09 Thread David S. Miller
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41:59 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it > would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the > commit messages for the csets in that tree be dated from the day yo

Re: bk commits and dates

2005-03-09 Thread Michael Ellerman
Two's company ... On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > While we are at such requests ... > > When you pull from one of the trees, like netdev, the commit messages > are sent to the bk commit list with the original date stamp of the patch > in the netdev tree. > > For example,

Re: bk commits and dates

2005-03-09 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > I don't know if I'm the only one to have a problem with that, but it > would be nice if it was possible, when you pull a bk tree, to have the > commit messages for the csets in that tree be dated from the day you > pulled, and not the day wh