On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:08:15PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > The results are a bit unclear, I took a 2.6.22-rc4 with beep.
> > > Logged into KDE.
> > > (hardware: Dell Latitude D810)
> > >
> > > S = successfull resume
> > > D = had to resume 2 times, that means when pressing the power butto
Hi!
> > The results are a bit unclear, I took a 2.6.22-rc4 with beep.
> > Logged into KDE.
> > (hardware: Dell Latitude D810)
> >
> > S = successfull resume
> > D = had to resume 2 times, that means when pressing the power button the
> > LED goes from blinking to on and after a few seconds it goe
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 09:46:34PM +0200, Christian Leber wrote:
> The results are a bit unclear, I took a 2.6.22-rc4 with beep.
> Logged into KDE.
> (hardware: Dell Latitude D810)
>
> S = successfull resume
> D = had to resume 2 times, that means when pressing the power button the
> LED goes fro
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 03:08:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Starting beeper as soon as ACPI sleep returns is very useful in
> debugging "apparently dead" machines. If it beeps at all, it makes
> sense to start playing with CMOS tracer.
thank you very much Pavel
The results are a bit unclear,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 03:12:57PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> (please group reply)
>
> > > How does the beep get turned off again?
> > May be it is turn off by the speaker driver.
> >
> >
> > BTW can't we do something with led ? This way it can be always enabled
> > without anoying p
Hi!
(please group reply)
> > How does the beep get turned off again?
> May be it is turn off by the speaker driver.
>
>
> BTW can't we do something with led ? This way it can be always enabled
> without anoying people
It would be more complex code, afaict, and ps/2 keyboard may be
absent. But
On Wednesday, 13 June 2007 14:28, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Ok. I'll take Pavel's silence as agreement too. I'll be a little slow
> > > > (as usual, nowadays!), but will try to get it done next week. I think I
> > > > can in clear conscience do it on Redhat time if I don't manage it
> >
Hi!
> > > Ok. I'll take Pavel's silence as agreement too. I'll be a little slow
> > > (as usual, nowadays!), but will try to get it done next week. I think I
> > > can in clear conscience do it on Redhat time if I don't manage it
> > > beforehand.
> >
> > Well, everyone wants it so what can I do.
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 10:24 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Wouldn't it be much more useful if it was unconditionally compiled in
> > > > and controlled instead by a sysfs entry? That way it will be far more
> > > > useful to $user who doesn't know or want to know how to compile an
Hi!
> > > Wouldn't it be much more useful if it was unconditionally compiled in
> > > and controlled instead by a sysfs entry? That way it will be far more
> > > useful to $user who doesn't know or want to know how to compile and
> > > install a kernel, but wants to do what they can to get provide
Hi.
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, 12 June 2007 00:42, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be much more useful if it was unconditionally compiled in
> > and controlled instead by a sysfs entry? That way it will be far more
> > us
Hi,
On Tuesday, 12 June 2007 00:42, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Wouldn't it be much more useful if it was unconditionally compiled in
> and controlled instead by a sysfs entry? That way it will be far more
> useful to $user who doesn't know or want to know how to compile and
> install a ker
Hi.
Wouldn't it be much more useful if it was unconditionally compiled in
and controlled instead by a sysfs entry? That way it will be far more
useful to $user who doesn't know or want to know how to compile and
install a kernel, but wants to do what they can to get provide helpful
debugging info
Hi!
> > Starting beeper as soon as ACPI sleep returns is very useful in
> > debugging "apparently dead" machines. If it beeps at all, it makes
> > sense to start playing with CMOS tracer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:00:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:08:17 +0200
> Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> How does the beep get turned off again?
May be it is turn off by the speaker driver.
BTW can't we do something with led ? This way it can be always
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:08:17 +0200
Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Starting beeper as soon as ACPI sleep returns is very useful in
> debugging "apparently dead" machines. If it beeps at all, it makes
> sense to start playing with CMOS tracer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PR
Hi!
> How about (WARNING! I never have written i386 assembly, my last assembly
> experience was 20 years ago on Z80, so this is basically just copy'n paste,
> but i hope you get the idea):
We probably can do that, if there's big enough demand.
> > --- a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> > +++ b/a
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 03:08:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
How about (WARNING! I never have written i386 assembly, my last assembly
experience was 20 years ago on Z80, so this is basically just copy'n paste,
but i hope you get the idea):
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/acpi/wakeup.S
> +++ b/arch/i386
On Sun 2007-06-10 09:27:55, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 00:54 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Sat 2007-06-09 15:16:04, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-06-09 15:08:17 +0200, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Starting beeper as soon as
Hi.
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 00:54 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sat 2007-06-09 15:16:04, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-06-09 15:08:17 +0200, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Starting beeper as soon as ACPI sleep returns is very useful in
> > > debugging "apparently
On Sat 2007-06-09 15:16:04, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-09 15:08:17 +0200, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Starting beeper as soon as ACPI sleep returns is very useful in
> > debugging "apparently dead" machines. If it beeps at all, it makes
> > sense to start playin
On Sat, 2007-06-09 15:08:17 +0200, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Starting beeper as soon as ACPI sleep returns is very useful in
> debugging "apparently dead" machines. If it beeps at all, it makes
> sense to start playing with CMOS tracer.
I'd even go so far and implement it uncond
22 matches
Mail list logo
