Re: ata-piix ACPI errors

2007-02-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Feb 22 2007 17:26, Meelis Roos wrote: Not in those but again note that the cable detection is broken ata2.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/33 It shows UDMA/100 for HDD and UDMA/33 for DVD-ROM. Visual inspection confirms that this is correct - DVD-ROM has 40-pin cable and HDD has

Re: ata-piix ACPI errors

2007-02-22 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Feb 22 2007 17:26, Meelis Roos wrote: >> Not in those but again note that the cable detection is broken >> >> > ata2.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/33 > >It shows UDMA/100 for HDD and UDMA/33 for DVD-ROM. Visual inspection >confirms that this is correct - DVD-ROM has 40-pin cable and HDD has >80-pin o

Re: ata-piix ACPI errors

2007-02-22 Thread Alan
> It shows UDMA/100 for HDD and UDMA/33 for DVD-ROM. Visual inspection > confirms that this is correct - DVD-ROM has 40-pin cable and HDD has > 80-pin one. So at least the result is not wrong. Ok sorry didn't realise this one had a genuine 40pin cable case, forgot the -mm message about limiting

Re: ata-piix ACPI errors

2007-02-22 Thread Meelis Roos
> Not in those but again note that the cable detection is broken > > > ata2.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/33 It shows UDMA/100 for HDD and UDMA/33 for DVD-ROM. Visual inspection confirms that this is correct - DVD-ROM has 40-pin cable and HDD has 80-pin one. So at least the result is not wrong. ata1: P

Re: ata-piix ACPI errors

2007-02-22 Thread Alan
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:29:42 +0200 (EET) Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Testbooted 2.6.21-rc1+todays git on a PC with Intel 845 chipset and PATA > HDD. Works fine but I now have these ACPI errors in dmesg, maybe someone > is interested: Not in those but again note that the cable detec