On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:05:06PM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:31:48PM +, Russell King wrote:
>
> > Good catch, thanks. I'd preferably like to see Chris Wedgwood test
> > this before applying it - I'm sure it'll fix his problem as well,
> > but I'd like to be sur
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:31:48PM +, Russell King wrote:
> Good catch, thanks. I'd preferably like to see Chris Wedgwood test
> this before applying it - I'm sure it'll fix his problem as well,
> but I'd like to be sure.
Yes, this appears to work correctly for me. I see it's merged so this
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:56:54PM +0100, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > Well, problem is not in bit 6 in IER, but in bit 6 in high divisor byte,
> > as DLAB is set to one from previous probe. This simple clear of LCR
> > register fixes problem with (proba
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:56:54PM +0100, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Well, problem is not in bit 6 in IER, but in bit 6 in high divisor byte,
> as DLAB is set to one from previous probe. This simple clear of LCR
> register fixes problem with (probably all 16550A) chips being detected
> as XScale, and
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 06:45:06PM +0100, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just booted my new kernel, and I've noticed that my UARTs are now
> recognized
> as XScale and not 16550A, and I could watch characters from parport0 line
> coming out
> on monitor one after another, with 0.5 second sp
5 matches
Mail list logo
