Andy Isaacson wrote:
> Most likely is that your app isn't behaving in a cache-friendly way.ÂÂIf
> your file will fit in memory, just fault it in sequentially (wc -l file)
> and then your app should cook.ÂÂIfÂyou'reÂnotÂgoingÂtoÂfitÂinÂmemory,
> the vm caching will probably only help if you have so
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:06:14PM -0500, jon ross wrote:
> I have an app with a small fixed memory footprint that does a lot of
> random reads from a large file. I thought if I added more memory to
> the machine the VM would do more caching of the disk, but added memory
> does not seem to make any
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:06:14PM -0500, jon ross wrote:
> I have an app with a small fixed memory footprint that does a lot of
> random reads from a large file. I thought if I added more memory to
> the machine the VM would do more caching of the disk, but added
> memory does not seem to make an
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 12:06 -0500, jon ross wrote:
> I have an app with a small fixed memory footprint that does a lot of
> random reads from a large file. I thought if I added more memory to
> the machine the VM would do more caching of the disk, but added memory
> does not seem to make any differ
4 matches
Mail list logo
