Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-03-04 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote: > On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:03:26AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing, > > > please let me know. > > > > I have no idea for auto-balancing but another idea: It's one possibility > > to let the user cho

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-03-04 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:03:26AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing, > > please let me know. > > I have no idea for auto-balancing but another idea: It's one possibility > to let the user choose when doing "make *config" what he wants: > >

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-03-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: > > > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused > > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got > > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively larg

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-02-26 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing, > please let me know. (I haven't seen even one suggestion posted.. must be a real bugger) I haven't found any silver bullets ;) but the one line bend-adjust below does help the cache problem a

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-02-24 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Joseph Bueno wrote: > Rik van Riel a écrit : > > On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: > > > > > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused > > > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got > > > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 ap

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-02-24 Thread Joseph Bueno
Rik van Riel a écrit : > > On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: > > > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused > > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got > > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large > > amounts o

Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1

2001-02-23 Thread Rik van Riel
On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large > amounts of it for buffers and cache while pushi