Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 15:07 -0800, seven wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> >
>> > No, I wasn't ignoring you for four days. Please, always do
>> reply-to-all.
>> >
>>
>> I am using nabble's interface to post messages ( www.nabble.com ) and I
>> am
>> not subscrib
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 15:07 -0800, seven wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > No, I wasn't ignoring you for four days. Please, always do reply-to-all.
> >
>
> I am using nabble's interface to post messages ( www.nabble.com ) and I am
> not subscribed to the mailing list, so it's possible th
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> No, I wasn't ignoring you for four days. Please, always do reply-to-all.
>
I am using nabble's interface to post messages ( www.nabble.com ) and I am
not subscribed to the mailing list, so it's possible that this is the cause
of the direct mail.
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:46:25 -0800 (PST)
seven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > A kernel profile will tell us were the kernel is burning CPU. Something
> > like this (run as root):
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > while true
> > do
> > opcontrol --stop
> > opcontrol --shutdown
> > rm -rf
> A kernel profile will tell us were the kernel is burning CPU. Something
> like this (run as root):
>
> #!/bin/sh
> while true
> do
> opcontrol --stop
> opcontrol --shutdown
> rm -rf /var/lib/oprofile
> opcontrol --vmlinux=/boot/vmlinux-$(uname -r)
> opcontrol --
5 matches
Mail list logo