On Thu, 21 June 2007 13:57:15 -0400, James Bruce wrote:
>
> efficient atomic snapshots on a filesystem. There are still some issues
> with unexpected disk space usage (it requires _additional_ disk space to
> _delete_ a file), and it tends to use more memory (you want to delay
> client writes
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 03:26:15PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> > Second, Oracle is now working on Btrfs (if ever a FS needed a better
> > name... is that pronounced ButterFS?).
>
> (In our silliest moments, yes. Absolutely.)
I'm sure when the PHBen are around it's "Better FS".
It's all a Free(s
> Second, Oracle is now working on Btrfs (if ever a FS needed a better
> name... is that pronounced ButterFS?).
(In our silliest moments, yes. Absolutely.)
- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
Hi,
Ph. Marek wrote:
in Oct 2000 there's been some discussion "Tux2 - evil patents sighted"
(http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0010.0/0343.html), and in Aug
2002 (http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.3/0332.html) Daniel
wrote
It's well down my list of priorities beca
4 matches
Mail list logo
