On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> 2.2.19pre has all the changes Neil has sent me. One reason I wanted to avoid
> NFS changes was that they would do somthings we didnt want. And they did
> although nothing too bad.
>
> The 2.2.19 schedule btw is about another week
Nice to hear that's it's
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil Brown) writes:
> >
> > Oh, please not again a stable kernel series with NFS problems, we're
> > locked in for ages. 2.2 was bad enough up to 2.2.18. We have ReiserFS
> > Oh, please not again a stable kernel series with NFS problems, we're
> > locked in for ages. 2.2 was bad enough up to 2.2.18. We have ReiserFS
> > in 2.4.1 (and not in 2.4.0), could we _please_ get NFS-exportable
> > ReiserFS in 2.4.4 or 2.4.5?
>
> 2.2.18 is still broken, won't play NFSv3 gam
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil Brown) writes:
>
> > I am looking forward to seeing lots of downloads and absolutely no
> > problem reports but is seems unlikely.
>
> > Alan Cox has suggested that these changes may not be appropriate for
> > 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil Brown) writes:
> I am looking forward to seeing lots of downloads and absolutely no
> problem reports but is seems unlikely.
> Alan Cox has suggested that these changes may not be appropriate for
> 2.4, so we might have to wait for 2.5 to see them on kernel.org, but
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
