Re: Supermount

2005-07-24 Thread zhilla
well, for a bit of OT discussion sake, here's how it imho SHOULD work, from user (noobs and non guru) desktop point of view: cd/dvds: mounted automatically on insert / first access. if a program is running from it (or a file is open from it), and user tries to eject it using button, or any eject

Re: Supermount

2005-07-23 Thread Ian Kent
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2005 18:38 schrieb Lasse Kärkkäinen / Tronic: > > > Supermount is obsolete there are other tools in userspace that do the > > > job perfectly. > > > e.g ivman which uses hal and dbus. > > > > They cannot mount on demand, thus cannot

Re: Supermount

2005-07-23 Thread Ian Kent
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Lasse K??rkk??inen / Tronic wrote: > > To mount on demand use autofs. Unmounting and dealing with media removal > > is the problem. > > Granted, that can get pretty close. However, having to use /auto/* > instead of mounting directly where required often limits using it quite

Re: Supermount

2005-07-23 Thread Lasse Kärkkäinen / Tronic
> To mount on demand use autofs. Unmounting and dealing with media removal > is the problem. Granted, that can get pretty close. However, having to use /auto/* instead of mounting directly where required often limits using it quite a bit. Thus, I don't see it as a real alternative. - Tronic - s

Re: Supermount

2005-07-23 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2005 18:38 schrieb Lasse Kärkkäinen / Tronic: > > Supermount is obsolete there are other tools in userspace that do the > > job perfectly. > > e.g ivman which uses hal and dbus. > > They cannot mount on demand, thus cannot do the same job. The boot > partition, for example, is

Re: Supermount

2005-07-22 Thread Lasse Kärkkäinen / Tronic
> Supermount is obsolete there are other tools in userspace that do the > job perfectly. > e.g ivman which uses hal and dbus. They cannot mount on demand, thus cannot do the same job. The boot partition, for example, is something that should only be mounted when required. The same obviously also g

Re: Supermount

2005-07-21 Thread ioGL64NX
>2005/7/21, Lasse Kärkkäinen / Tronic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is there a reason why this magnificient piece of software is not already > in the mainline? It seems to be working very well and provides > functionality that simply isn't available otherwise. > Hi Tronic, Supermount is obsolete there a

Re: Supermount

2005-07-21 Thread Francois Romieu
Lasse K??rkk??inen / Tronic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Is there a reason why this magnificient piece of software is not already > in the mainline? Yes, there is. Please search the archives. -- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message t

Re: Supermount / ivman

2005-01-22 Thread Con Kolivas
Gustavo Guillermo Perez wrote: Cause I play with old toys, (floppys) and ivman doesn't work properly on the lastest gentoo with floppys, I retouch for a while the supermount patch from sourceforge for kernel 2.6.11-rc1. I'm a n00b on kernel, I do this only for general purposes helping some frie

Re: supermount

2001-07-06 Thread Dj_RzulF
I gree with Stevie Kieu and Sam Halliday -- Best regards, Dj_RzulF - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http:/

Re: supermount

2001-06-29 Thread John Silva
Supermount has been integrated into the Mandrake 8 kernel (2.4); I have been unable to locate the standalone patch for this, however. Steve Kieu wrote: > > --- Sam Halliday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This > email was delivered to you by The Free > > Internet, > > a Business Online Group compa

Re: supermount

2001-06-25 Thread Steve Kieu
--- Sam Halliday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This email was delivered to you by The Free > Internet, > a Business Online Group company. > http://www.thefreeinternet.net I totally aggree, supermount is nice features and it should be integrated into the main kernel stream (just my HO) > ---

Re: supermount ?

2001-03-22 Thread Alan Cox
> Supermount sounds to me like a very important part of linux, at least for us > who like our cds/dvds/etc. to work as easily as in fx. windows. For linux to > be popular among "normal" users, it should be present at every system with > local removable drives. So, my question is; why isn't supe

Re: supermount ?

2001-03-22 Thread Erik Gustavsson
I don't know if this applies to 2.4.2, but there is a patch for 2.4.0: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/8144/supermount.html /cyr --- Lister: Shouldn't this plug in to something? Holly: Yes, that joins up with the wh