Re: Status of SATA support

2005-03-21 Thread Andre Tomt
Jeff Garzik wrote: Andre Tomt wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote: Since this document is a bit our of date: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html What's out-of-date about that URL? Jeff A update on the Marvell status? :-P No Marvell status change, so no need to update..

Re: Status of SATA support

2005-03-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
Andre Tomt wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote: Since this document is a bit our of date: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html What's out-of-date about that URL? Jeff A update on the Marvell status? :-P No Marvell status change, so no need to update... Anyway, is there

Re: Status of SATA support

2005-03-21 Thread Andre Tomt
Jeff Garzik wrote: Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote: Since this document is a bit our of date: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html What's out-of-date about that URL? Jeff A update on the Marvell status? :-P Anyway, is there any of the current work on Marvell available somewhere, so that some

Re: Status of SATA support

2005-03-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote: Since this document is a bit our of date: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html What's out-of-date about that URL? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo in

Re: Status of SATA support

2005-03-21 Thread Raphael Jacquot
Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote: Since this document is a bit our of date: http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html What's the best supported brand and/or model of SATA/RAID controllers which do not suck? Thanks. 3ware works well for me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin